* [PATCH v2 01/19] tracepoint: Add trace_call__##name() API
2026-03-23 16:00 [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
@ 2026-03-23 16:00 ` Vineeth Pillai (Google)
2026-03-26 1:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-03-23 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] mm: damon: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vineeth Pillai (Google) @ 2026-03-23 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Peter Zijlstra, Dmitry Ilvokhin
Cc: Vineeth Pillai (Google),
Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, Ingo Molnar, Jens Axboe,
io-uring, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Xin Long, Jon Maloy, Aaron Conole,
Eelco Chaudron, Ilya Maximets, netdev, bpf, linux-sctp,
tipc-discussion, dev, Jiri Pirko, Oded Gabbay, Koby Elbaz,
dri-devel, Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Gautham R. Shenoy,
Huang Rui, Mario Limonciello, Len Brown, Srinivas Pandruvada,
linux-pm, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi,
Christian König, Sumit Semwal, linaro-mm-sig, Eddie James,
Andrew Jeffery, Joel Stanley, linux-fsi, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Alex Deucher, Danilo Krummrich, Matthew Brost,
Philipp Stanner, Harry Wentland, Leo Li, amd-gfx, Jiri Kosina,
Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c,
Mark Brown, Michael Hennerich, Nuno Sá,
linux-spi, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi,
Chris Mason, David Sterba, linux-btrfs, Thomas Gleixner,
Andrew Morton, SeongJae Park, linux-mm, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, linux-trace-kernel, linux-kernel
Add trace_call__##name() as a companion to trace_##name(). When a
caller already guards a tracepoint with an explicit enabled check:
if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond)
trace_foo(args);
trace_foo() internally repeats the static_branch_unlikely() test, which
the compiler cannot fold since static branches are patched binary
instructions. This results in two static-branch evaluations for every
guarded call site.
trace_call__##name() calls __do_trace_##name() directly, skipping the
redundant static-branch re-check. This avoids leaking the internal
__do_trace_##name() symbol into call sites while still eliminating the
double evaluation:
if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond)
trace_invoke_foo(args); /* calls __do_trace_foo() directly */
Three locations are updated:
- __DECLARE_TRACE: invoke form omits static_branch_unlikely, retains
the LOCKDEP RCU-watching assertion.
- __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL: same, plus retains might_fault().
- !TRACEPOINTS_ENABLED stub: empty no-op so callers compile cleanly
when tracepoints are compiled out.
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-4-6
---
include/linux/tracepoint.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index 22ca1c8b54f32..ed969705341f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -294,6 +294,10 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(), \
"RCU not watching for tracepoint"); \
} \
+ } \
+ static inline void trace_call__##name(proto) \
+ { \
+ __do_trace_##name(args); \
}
#define __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL(name, proto, args, data_proto) \
@@ -313,6 +317,11 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(), \
"RCU not watching for tracepoint"); \
} \
+ } \
+ static inline void trace_call__##name(proto) \
+ { \
+ might_fault(); \
+ __do_trace_##name(args); \
}
/*
@@ -398,6 +407,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
#define __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, proto, args, data_proto) \
static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
{ } \
+ static inline void trace_call__##name(proto) \
+ { } \
static inline int \
register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), \
void *data) \
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 01/19] tracepoint: Add trace_call__##name() API
2026-03-23 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] tracepoint: Add trace_call__##name() API Vineeth Pillai (Google)
@ 2026-03-26 1:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Masami Hiramatsu @ 2026-03-26 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vineeth Pillai (Google)
Cc: Steven Rostedt, Peter Zijlstra, Dmitry Ilvokhin,
Masami Hiramatsu, Mathieu Desnoyers, Ingo Molnar, Jens Axboe,
io-uring, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Xin Long, Jon Maloy, Aaron Conole,
Eelco Chaudron, Ilya Maximets, netdev, bpf, linux-sctp,
tipc-discussion, dev, Jiri Pirko, Oded Gabbay, Koby Elbaz,
dri-devel, Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Gautham R. Shenoy,
Huang Rui, Mario Limonciello, Len Brown, Srinivas Pandruvada,
linux-pm, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi,
Christian König, Sumit Semwal, linaro-mm-sig, Eddie James,
Andrew Jeffery, Joel Stanley, linux-fsi, David Airlie,
Simona Vetter, Alex Deucher, Danilo Krummrich, Matthew Brost,
Philipp Stanner, Harry Wentland, Leo Li, amd-gfx, Jiri Kosina,
Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c,
Mark Brown, Michael Hennerich, Nuno Sá,
linux-spi, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi,
Chris Mason, David Sterba, linux-btrfs, Thomas Gleixner,
Andrew Morton, SeongJae Park, linux-mm, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, linux-trace-kernel, linux-kernel
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:00:20 -0400
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> Add trace_call__##name() as a companion to trace_##name(). When a
> caller already guards a tracepoint with an explicit enabled check:
>
> if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond)
> trace_foo(args);
>
> trace_foo() internally repeats the static_branch_unlikely() test, which
> the compiler cannot fold since static branches are patched binary
> instructions. This results in two static-branch evaluations for every
> guarded call site.
>
> trace_call__##name() calls __do_trace_##name() directly, skipping the
> redundant static-branch re-check. This avoids leaking the internal
> __do_trace_##name() symbol into call sites while still eliminating the
> double evaluation:
>
> if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond)
> trace_invoke_foo(args); /* calls __do_trace_foo() directly */
nit: trace_call_foo() instead of trace_invoke_foo()?
Anyway looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> Three locations are updated:
> - __DECLARE_TRACE: invoke form omits static_branch_unlikely, retains
> the LOCKDEP RCU-watching assertion.
> - __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL: same, plus retains might_fault().
> - !TRACEPOINTS_ENABLED stub: empty no-op so callers compile cleanly
> when tracepoints are compiled out.
>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-4-6
> ---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index 22ca1c8b54f32..ed969705341f1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -294,6 +294,10 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(), \
> "RCU not watching for tracepoint"); \
> } \
> + } \
> + static inline void trace_call__##name(proto) \
> + { \
> + __do_trace_##name(args); \
> }
>
> #define __DECLARE_TRACE_SYSCALL(name, proto, args, data_proto) \
> @@ -313,6 +317,11 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> WARN_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching(), \
> "RCU not watching for tracepoint"); \
> } \
> + } \
> + static inline void trace_call__##name(proto) \
> + { \
> + might_fault(); \
> + __do_trace_##name(args); \
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -398,6 +407,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> #define __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, proto, args, data_proto) \
> static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
> { } \
> + static inline void trace_call__##name(proto) \
> + { } \
> static inline int \
> register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), \
> void *data) \
> --
> 2.53.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 18/19] mm: damon: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites
2026-03-23 16:00 [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
2026-03-23 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] tracepoint: Add trace_call__##name() API Vineeth Pillai (Google)
@ 2026-03-23 16:00 ` Vineeth Pillai (Google)
2026-03-24 0:25 ` SeongJae Park
2026-03-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded " Steven Rostedt
2026-04-18 23:04 ` Steven Rostedt
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Vineeth Pillai (Google) @ 2026-03-23 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Vineeth Pillai (Google),
Steven Rostedt, Peter Zijlstra, SeongJae Park, Andrew Morton,
damon, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
Replace trace_damos_stat_after_apply_interval() with
trace_call__damos_stat_after_apply_interval() at a site already guarded
by an early return when !trace_damos_stat_after_apply_interval_enabled(),
avoiding a redundant static_branch_unlikely() re-evaluation inside the
tracepoint.
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
---
mm/damon/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
index adfc52fee9dc2..b1cc4f44f90a2 100644
--- a/mm/damon/core.c
+++ b/mm/damon/core.c
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ static void damos_trace_stat(struct damon_ctx *c, struct damos *s)
break;
sidx++;
}
- trace_damos_stat_after_apply_interval(cidx, sidx, &s->stat);
+ trace_call__damos_stat_after_apply_interval(cidx, sidx, &s->stat);
}
static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] mm: damon: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites
2026-03-23 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] mm: damon: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
@ 2026-03-24 0:25 ` SeongJae Park
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2026-03-24 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vineeth Pillai (Google)
Cc: SeongJae Park, Steven Rostedt, Peter Zijlstra, Andrew Morton,
damon, linux-mm, linux-kernel, linux-trace-kernel
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:00:37 -0400 "Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> Replace trace_damos_stat_after_apply_interval() with
> trace_call__damos_stat_after_apply_interval() at a site already guarded
> by an early return when !trace_damos_stat_after_apply_interval_enabled(),
> avoiding a redundant static_branch_unlikely() re-evaluation inside the
> tracepoint.
>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites
2026-03-23 16:00 [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
2026-03-23 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] tracepoint: Add trace_call__##name() API Vineeth Pillai (Google)
2026-03-23 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] mm: damon: Use trace_call__##name() at guarded tracepoint call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
@ 2026-03-24 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-04-18 23:04 ` Steven Rostedt
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-03-24 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vineeth Pillai (Google)
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Dmitry Ilvokhin, Masami Hiramatsu,
Mathieu Desnoyers, Ingo Molnar, Jens Axboe, io-uring,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner,
Xin Long, Jon Maloy, Aaron Conole, Eelco Chaudron, Ilya Maximets,
netdev, bpf, linux-sctp, tipc-discussion, dev, Jiri Pirko,
Oded Gabbay, Koby Elbaz, dri-devel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Gautham R. Shenoy, Huang Rui, Mario Limonciello,
Len Brown, Srinivas Pandruvada, linux-pm, MyungJoo Ham,
Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Christian König, Sumit Semwal,
linaro-mm-sig, Eddie James, Andrew Jeffery, Joel Stanley,
linux-fsi, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Alex Deucher,
Danilo Krummrich, Matthew Brost, Philipp Stanner, Harry Wentland,
Leo Li, amd-gfx, Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input,
Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, Mark Brown, Michael Hennerich,
Nuno Sá,
linux-spi, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi,
Chris Mason, David Sterba, linux-btrfs, Thomas Gleixner,
Andrew Morton, SeongJae Park, linux-mm, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, linux-trace-kernel, linux-kernel
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:00:19 -0400
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> When a caller already guards a tracepoint with an explicit enabled check:
>
> if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond)
> trace_foo(args);
Thanks Vineeth!
I'm going to start pulling in this series. I'll take the first patch, and
then any patch that has an Acked-by or Reviewed-by from the maintainer.
For patches without acks, I'll leave alone and then after the first patch
gets merged into mainline, the maintainers could pull in their own patches
at their own convenience. Unless of course they speak up now if they want
me to take them ;-)
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites
2026-03-23 16:00 [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded call sites Vineeth Pillai (Google)
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-03-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 00/19] tracepoint: Avoid double static_branch evaluation at guarded " Steven Rostedt
@ 2026-04-18 23:04 ` Steven Rostedt
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2026-04-18 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vineeth Pillai (Google)
Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Dmitry Ilvokhin, Masami Hiramatsu,
Mathieu Desnoyers, Ingo Molnar, Jens Axboe, io-uring,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner,
Xin Long, Jon Maloy, Aaron Conole, Eelco Chaudron, Ilya Maximets,
netdev, bpf, linux-sctp, tipc-discussion, dev, Jiri Pirko,
Oded Gabbay, Koby Elbaz, dri-devel, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Viresh Kumar, Gautham R. Shenoy, Huang Rui, Mario Limonciello,
Len Brown, Srinivas Pandruvada, linux-pm, MyungJoo Ham,
Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi, Christian König, Sumit Semwal,
linaro-mm-sig, Eddie James, Andrew Jeffery, Joel Stanley,
linux-fsi, David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Alex Deucher,
Danilo Krummrich, Matthew Brost, Philipp Stanner, Harry Wentland,
Leo Li, amd-gfx, Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires, linux-input,
Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, Mark Brown, Michael Hennerich,
Nuno Sá,
linux-spi, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi,
Chris Mason, David Sterba, linux-btrfs, Thomas Gleixner,
Andrew Morton, SeongJae Park, linux-mm, Borislav Petkov,
Dave Hansen, x86, linux-trace-kernel, linux-kernel
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:00:19 -0400
"Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> wrote:
> if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond)
> trace_call__foo(args); /* calls __do_trace_foo() directly */
Hi Vineeth,
Could you rebase this series on top of 7.1-rc1 when it comes out?
Several of these patches were accepted already. Obviously drop those.
They were the patches that added the feature, and any where the
maintainer acked the patch.
Now that the feature has been accepted, if you post the patch series
again after 7.1-rc1 with all the patches that haven't been accepted
yet, then the maintainers can simply take them directly. As the feature
is now accepted, there's no dependency on it, and they don't need to go
through the tracing tree.
Thanks,
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread