Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/damon: reset thread status parameters upon kdamond termination

[Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:12:28 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Maybe I suggested too much...  If we decide to take both my suggested commit
> description and the above change direction, maybe it is difficult to say you
> are the main author who should be primarily responsible for any followup issues
> on the patch.  Of course you will still deserve to have credits.  Maybe
> 'Co-developed-by:'?

Yes, I've decide to adopt both your suggested commit description and the
implementation. Therefore, since you've done the most of the work, you
should be the main author of this patch.

> 
> Meanwhile, I feel like the fix of this bug is taking bit unnecessarily long
> time...

My apologies. I have had limited bandwidth recently.

> 
> If you agree, hence, I'd like to take this over from this point, and finish up
> the remaining works for this patch.  If you also agree, I will also take the
> responsibility (authorship) from you, while keeping keep your credits with
> 'Co-developed-by:' tag.  What do you think?

I agree to hand over this patch to you. Thank you for your help.

> 
> By the way, I hope I'm not making you to get me wrong.  I'm not trying to steal
> your credit (authorship).  In my opinion the authorship means the
> responsibility (or, who to blame) more than the credit.  Putting right name to
> the place for the responsibility is important for the long term maintenance and
> evolvement of the community and the product (Linux) in my opinion, so I have to
> say this.

Thank you for your explanation. I understand your point that authorship
implies responsibility, and since most of the core ideas for this patch
came from you, I fully agree that you should be the main author.

Best regards,
Rui Yan