linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/mm: Simplify byte pattern checking in mremap_test
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:16:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415101623.33004858@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57b5d0f9-3e56-4f96-9e3a-2f475a78a8eb@arm.com>

On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:05:01 +0530
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> wrote:

...
> > 
> > c) Remove any randomization from the test. There is no need for random
> >    patterns, just fill pages with increasing numbers.  
> 
> Agreed.

I'd start from (say) 0x123456789abcdef0 rather than zero to avoid lots
of zero bytes.

> > d) Just always verify the whole regions. Without the rand() magic this
> >    will probably be just ... fairly fast?  
> 
> Yeah we are doing a simple memcmp() so it is fine.

You don't need a copy of the buffer, just compare against the pattern
that filled it.

	David

> 
> I'll implement these changes.
> 
> >   
> 
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-15  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15  4:45 Dev Jain
2026-04-15  6:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-04-15  7:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-15  8:35   ` Dev Jain
2026-04-15  8:50     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-15  9:16     ` David Laight [this message]
2026-04-15  9:21       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260415101623.33004858@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sarthak.sharma@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox