From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB93E743EF for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232663AbjI2HZD (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 03:25:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232694AbjI2HZC (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 03:25:02 -0400 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c010:41de::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34DEC1A7; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:25:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=weissschuh.net; s=mail; t=1695972298; bh=HpzRRZlXUO8idlHVwHRQ6iQGOBYk+mpAmBjFyjM6mRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uSAYNFsvtTqI+DwUkO0HJIY9o3MgBjaKb5jrIv/qkeCCLjrzQV1eGlNRXWpMoNBPc GxUHZB7WWsfvRoZ2vpFQ0TDOBM7pWX20ceyJ42rMjwYKPgdNCo1rMso7UMfEEwtM// o1VXhnIHsv6+29Q68RWQwKlxm+IkwjRjV30LHRmo= Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:24:57 +0200 From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: encourage direct notifications to reviewers Message-ID: References: <20230927-docs-cc-reviewer-v1-1-2af46ceb2d3c@weissschuh.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On 2023-09-28 02:13:35-0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > NAK. That's honestly surprising. I mentioned this process in various reviews before and nobody had issues with it so far. > This does not scale. Could you elaborate in which way it doesn't scale? > Please read the mailinglist, that's the whole > point of having it. When reviewing things in various subsystem this would require reading all of LKML, which is impractical. The goal of this patch was to make life easier for occasional reviewers. If it negatively impacts the maintainers then that's not gonna work. Thomas