From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F074C77B73 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 21:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229904AbjFDVyC (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2023 17:54:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39302 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229680AbjFDVyC (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2023 17:54:02 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A96A6; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 14:54:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=v0kdGZEJ992DG/hu03jxO4B41LPgZK2Zh/+I1NymOz8=; b=StVZgoVqk+aDAbbYXo2UwJfXqt zpDTma/LeYDNQzzQGXslI5cjWRKp46gMnKqxo0I6A2dKepC+ZZ+yocTHLN/ArShm5pzF0ooftDjqa W7xmE3F6+HQ8QH0OXCqLSHvJZN9qNseWPG4xNWt+psn1qYFEF6kmfhCBJekiKzcT1a6zVPpLM454a zJ+Ijsr72HcMVdXvA2BnW8zkXqzy1fR2vkDfGdiA+MQwrsI8aQFQvvKKlHnvv0tdZQUgTSvXgtLtL zFK3v3YJy5fhDSauNqAychPOEsSQ7emejhN5T+abmccWtGN+qNMRolyrrLtGhptx0HtQWT+0aY31J PmRkM/iw==; Received: from [2601:1c2:980:9ec0::2764] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1q5vfi-00DFcq-1b; Sun, 04 Jun 2023 21:53:58 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 14:53:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists To: Bagas Sanjaya , James Seo , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Kalle Valo , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230603151447.29288-1-james@equiv.tech> <10e68064-42a3-c80e-10cc-079a3cf4eb35@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <10e68064-42a3-c80e-10cc-079a3cf4eb35@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On 6/4/23 07:01, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 6/3/23 22:14, James Seo wrote: >> To reduce ambiguity and eliminate this class of potential (albeit >> tangential) issues, prescribe sending patches 'To' maintainers and >> 'Cc' lists. While we're at it, strengthen the recommendation to use >> scripts/get_maintainer.pl to find patch recipients, and move Andrew >> Morton's callout as the maintainer of last resort to the next >> paragraph for better flow. >> > > IMO, To: and Cc: don't have any practical differences between two, > and I usually do vice-versa when sending patches: lists are in To: > and individual maintainers are in Cc: Ack all of that. -- ~Randy