From: Nikolai Kondrashov <Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Veronika Kabatova <vkabatov@redhat.com>,
CKI <cki-project@redhat.com>,
kernelci@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: field for required tests
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 14:00:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2d18278-1fdb-440e-8009-4ec49749b71c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e8979163c8ed93f6990c6a91c34cdf96a76daaf.camel@perches.com>
On 11/15/23 20:31, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 19:43 +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> Introduce a new 'V:' ("Verify") field to MAINTAINERS. The field accepts
>> a name of a test suite which is required to be executed for each
>> contribution to the subsystem.
>
> Perhaps this is simply too much overhead
> process requirements for most kernel work.
>
> While the addition of V: seems ok, I think
> putting the verification in checkpatch is
> odd at best and the verification of test
> execution should be a separate script.
I agree that this extends checkpatch.pl responsibilities somewhat. In the
sense that it requires you to do something beside changing the patch itself.
OTOH, checkpatch.pl already requires Signed-off-by:, which prompts you to
check and clear up your authorship, similarly requiring work outside the patch.
At the same time, you're supposed to test your changes anyway. Sometimes it's
manual and one-off, but often times running an existing test suite is at least
beneficial, if not required.
In a sense, this is not *checkpatch.pl* itself requiring testing, but
subsystem maintainers (who are opting in), and checkpatch.pl simply provides
convenient means and an entry point for raising attention to maintainer's
requests, and making it easier to discover the tests.
It also does *not* verify test execution, only alerts the contributors to the
need, and requires certification. Again, similar to Signed-off-by:.
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 17:43 [RFC PATCH 0/3] " Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 17:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 18:31 ` Joe Perches
2023-11-15 20:01 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-16 12:00 ` Nikolai Kondrashov [this message]
2023-11-15 20:14 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-16 12:09 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 20:38 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-11-16 12:14 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-16 13:26 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-16 13:52 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-20 12:40 ` Gustavo Padovan
2023-11-20 13:31 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-22 17:41 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-16 13:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-11-16 13:41 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-16 13:43 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-11-16 13:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-16 14:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-11-20 13:30 ` Ricardo Cañuelo
2023-11-20 20:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-20 22:27 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-21 6:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-21 10:37 ` David Gow
2023-11-21 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-22 16:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-21 18:24 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-21 18:02 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-21 10:36 ` David Gow
2023-11-21 20:48 ` Mark Brown
2023-11-22 17:19 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-22 1:08 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-15 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Require kvm-xfstests smoke for ext4 Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-15 18:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-16 16:33 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-17 7:09 ` Chandan Babu R
2023-11-19 22:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-11-22 14:44 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-22 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-11-22 17:44 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-22 20:51 ` Dave Chinner
2023-11-15 17:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Require kunit core tests for framework changes Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-11-20 18:48 ` Daniel Latypov
2023-11-22 17:38 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] get_maintainer: Survive querying missing files Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:55 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 16:16 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2024-01-31 13:55 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:58 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 16:21 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 8:12 ` David Gow
2023-12-06 16:23 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 16:38 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 16:57 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] MAINTAINERS: Propose kunit core tests for framework changes Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] docs: submitting-patches: Introduce Tested-with: Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:59 ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-12-05 19:07 ` Joe Perches
2023-12-06 10:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-12-06 16:46 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 16:31 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] checkpatch: Propose tests to execute Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] MAINTAINERS: Support referencing test docs in V: Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-06 8:03 ` David Gow
2023-12-06 16:54 ` Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] MAINTAINERS: Propose kvm-xfstests smoke for ext4 Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] docs: tests: Document kunit in general Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] MAINTAINERS: Propose kunit tests for regmap Nikolai Kondrashov
2023-12-05 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add proposal strength to V: entries Nikolai Kondrashov
2024-01-08 10:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] MAINTAINERS: Introduce V: entry for tests Nikolai Kondrashov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2d18278-1fdb-440e-8009-4ec49749b71c@redhat.com \
--to=nikolai.kondrashov@redhat.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kernelci@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vkabatov@redhat.com \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox