From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 DONOTMERGE] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other people
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8cae2d3-d855-404b-8991-f81c979486ce@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202110210.5e56d69e@foz.lan>
On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> escreveu:
>
>>> +Tagging people requires permission
>>> +----------------------------------
>>> +
>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:,
>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named.
>>> +For the three aforementioned ones implicit permission is sufficient if the
>>> +person contributed to the Linux kernel using that name and email address
>>> +according to the lore archives or the commit history -- and in case of
>>> +Reported-by: and Suggested-by: did the reporting or suggestion in public.
>>> +Note, bugzilla.kernel.org is a public place in this sense, but email addresses
>>> +used there are private; so do not expose them in tags, unless the person used
>>> +them in earlier contributions.
First: thx for your Review-by given earlier!
> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions:
>
> Requested-by:
>
> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1.
>
> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to
> be added on a patch series.
Hmmm, that is one of those "grey area" tags[1], as it's not documented
yet afaics ('grep -ir Requested-by Documentation/
scripts/get_maintainer.pl' gave nothing). Documenting it would make it
official; I'm not sure if that is wanted and say that is something that
should be done independently if somebody wants to make it official.
Ciao, Thorsten
[1] like "Reported-and-tested-by", which according to
Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst should not be used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 8:14 Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-12-02 8:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-02 10:02 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-02 13:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2024-12-02 14:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-02 15:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-12-02 16:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-03 6:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-12-03 6:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-04 1:06 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8cae2d3-d855-404b-8991-f81c979486ce@leemhuis.info \
--to=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox