From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C819628314A; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757964557; cv=none; b=gGZSo426IxdvYWnoGv0ttMjuZXfj6DwBZLb7RzFC7m2KoeLfsnfYgQLduFttd3xSGeubbXI38H0dky+Jbx3cKuLbgqe1gyLALYI+SKs7LS6nHrD2BHpWqhoehJ+UsL8uG63xERqBVdxZyiyuTTLu5Yyjrtj+TQtB7m8wQW48ZBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757964557; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W+5vxPZXQflnKrX9eGh5fWsCigAJNqd3stTJWQmEEi0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=T2+HvYq8oYM5zc5NskzPWT/gQthLc7FdzwujUtrE+2ePJN6KjkdHnDA/2CxJbJIT7U5vKJ5E8wASCd760+/YCdKlhehq8uIC7QDldVmVGYh5t5KXP6WqFGLFnwgkWBa3TlwBNampjS2H1vX78oKHdUhdvoEoTlQT2nEXrZ17UMs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=WFhWm1/g; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="WFhWm1/g" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ZbQp6a6Zj/MsZULZi4Bi7x/UTatlCEOy3h1PtigaPRU=; b=WFhWm1/gMVCa86Z7w19EVIu7JH I9OBrJxo/xqGxBa24IYE2MHatDqU56lhTVaRFcftVBwzkLaQzr44Ne06H1o/wsHZWOLDcfHsGatx9 Ke2zfUT+VE7kV8xIbbU7NFtetOONtzVIzyEg15w7OC9j2qrhUcZQrmjeePk9kXOgL1TyxSG4Lpy3R y1H7hFEmecYEB0snDyhYiAtr+I1vMv+6GK8PVvNHZddGBe7dJiwOMPk0ZrXZZUUGJqSnzEhBhMHUh 5VsuMXHvYXwB7ogSVVAsO+Qe6L2jBU0he1BNCvOm0wb6fHCkIzBiWKC8CT+lRqjZavFgjiNcgUqOu pi3N2jRA==; Received: from [50.53.25.54] (helo=[192.168.254.17]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uyEsw-00000005VZR-2VpN; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:29:10 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:29:10 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: maintainer: Fix capitalization To: Thorsten Blum , Jonathan Corbet Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250915192235.2414746-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <20250915192235.2414746-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 9/15/25 12:22 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote: > The sentence starts at the previous line: s/Indicate/indicate/ Are you sure? ISTM that the entire line is a "sub-heading". > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum > --- > Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst > index cda5d691e967..f411a0d10fad 100644 > --- a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst > +++ b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ wait for the next -rc. At a minimum: > submissions should appear before -rc5. > > - Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions > - Indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch > + indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch > set will need to wait for the NEXT+1 merge window. Of course there is no > obligation to ever accept any given patchset, but if the review has not > concluded by this point the expectation is the contributor should wait and -- ~Randy