From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 DONOTMERGE] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other people
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 07:25:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd47620e-d2bd-48f5-8e40-555d6ddf921e@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202171734.2874a9a3@foz.lan>
On 02.12.24 17:17, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:54:49 +0100
> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> escreveu:
>> On 02.12.24 15:45, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:56 +0100
>>> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> escreveu:
>>>> On 02.12.24 11:02, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>>>> Em Mon, 2 Dec 2024 09:28:57 +0100
>>>>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> escreveu:
>>>>>>> +Tagging people requires permission
>>>>>>> +----------------------------------
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +Be careful in the addition of tags to your patches, as all except for Cc:,
>>>>>>> +Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit permission of the person named.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm... There is another tag that we use without requiring explicit permissions:
>>>>>
>>>>> Requested-by:
>>>>>
>>>>> There are currently 376 occurrences on 6.13-rc1.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is used when a maintainer or reviewer publicly requests some changes to
>>>>> be added on a patch series.
>>> [...]
>>> You're basically requesting explicit permission for any "non-official"
>>> tags as well, including reviewed-by. This is not what it is wanted here.
>>
>> I could easily use a slightly modified phrase like "...as all
>> mentioned above except...".
>
> It seems a lot better to me.
I went with this a slightly different variant for readability:
Be careful in the addition of the aforementioned tags to your patches,
as all except for Cc:, Reported-by:, and Suggested-by: need explicit
permission of the person named.
Hope that's okay. If I don't hear anything, I'll assume your earlier
Reviewed-by: is still valid.
Ciao, Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 8:14 Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-12-02 8:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-02 10:02 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-02 13:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-12-02 14:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-02 15:54 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-12-02 16:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-03 6:25 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2024-12-03 6:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2024-12-04 1:06 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd47620e-d2bd-48f5-8e40-555d6ddf921e@leemhuis.info \
--to=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox