From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8442835F8AF; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768377886; cv=none; b=FmgutUjRWZboBLd++K+K+bfjxNNcU7MfIgts/nyBfF9RIH9Vp02tOjyaFxtuLDGvJAxm5E8SWBa3RIxsJgHIfoHUtN6B/cXCQ7dT5je6TF0JP9m9H6+5SYHY1rAkPeIUWUgOygy1HUCBWDINlDw1jHi0OGOlWLq0k9inObiORmU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768377886; c=relaxed/simple; bh=teWN20ErRnFtv3ipS8RQd+DHv2eZXyLMY8Q+zMcAC9k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JLNq2WcI4zElN5PsKzHCjA1tEh6DbtSHRdGL9MK+1eRIf59rmQO2Lnod81EyN6I3prTPzR1eS2wvDlqZ5ZGMMf94QnZ5niUA2flmkmSvOAKTfmhchBNGid1qIUupeR31Gim2HJLoww6KUHjXLg/I4SCR0xM+TubMF6Dt2ctFuuw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UlhPj/Cd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UlhPj/Cd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36472C4CEF7; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:04:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768377885; bh=teWN20ErRnFtv3ipS8RQd+DHv2eZXyLMY8Q+zMcAC9k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UlhPj/CdsZpVwuqS9sYLhiBfxizD0sDhbtpCoZtuThoMEglisoP0wuV02Aeg1qDWY iTBgcjjqRY3GY0VSfcYY9jbgc2VdAB2Pd3VCaw8MUDpRRsfmW7ds3AuQcOy/X/cCQT EgfFSnef13TyQdm5OeUG4Vw9sNSmjUIzz2xCgiXfxamDjukHcmRyFGAB8x9H1OQAOV rCqx0yo2RhSHU7oU/kKVIptXpLaSTBMzTs7dsYislI/+iH1h8j5r5vLmdmm3tB2rcB rR3DWevVmcpd1aK2zUqjuzoWYq2uKZjh0C1nEjVwL2ysWdhLOmkBsqbUCD+FS8BKe0 3EydlRksfLQkA== Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:04:41 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jonathan Corbet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: netdev: refine 15-patch limit Message-ID: References: <20260113-15-minutes-of-fame-v1-1-0806b418c6fd@kernel.org> <20260113173454.55a995cc@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260113173454.55a995cc@kernel.org> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 05:34:54PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:47:15 +0000 Simon Horman wrote: > > +Limit patches outstanding on mailing list > > +----------------------------------------- > > + > > +Avoid having more than 15 patches, across all series, outstanding for > > +review on the mailing list. This limit is intended to focus developer > > +effort on testing patches before upstream review. Aiding the quality of > > +upstream submissions, and easing the load on reviewers. > > Thanks for adding this. > > In practice I think the limit is also per tree (net vs net-next) > to avoid head of line blocking fixes. Thanks Jakub, In v2 I'll update the wording to state that the limit is per-tree.