From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, josh@joshtriplett.org, kees@kernel.org,
konstantin@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] README: restructure with role-based documentation and guidelines
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:48:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJoQs_5Mp7-LAtTS@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWaVvAfm6LMxSpPuz3yZ7FDAexbUTOXrg58TqoWbce5ag@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 10:22:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>Hi Sasha,
>
>On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 at 10:09, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Reorganize README to provide targeted documentation paths for different
>> user roles including developers, researchers, security experts,
>> maintainers, and AI coding assistants. Add quick start section and
>> essential docs links.
>>
>> Include proper attribution requirements for AI-assisted contributions
>> using Assisted-by tags with agent details and tools used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
>
>Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/README
>> +++ b/README
>
>> +Who Are You?
>> +============
>> +
>> +Find your role below:
>> +
>> +* New Kernel Developer - Getting started with kernel development
>> +* Academic Researcher - Studying kernel internals and architecture
>> +* Security Expert - Hardening and vulnerability analysis
>> +* Backport/Maintenance Engineer - Maintaining stable kernels
>> +* System Administrator - Configuring and troubleshooting
>> +* Maintainer - Leading subsystems and reviewing patches
>
>Kernel Maintainer?
>Driver/Subsystem Maintainer?
I tried to use similar terms to the ones used by the rest of our docs.
In this case, the CoC interpertation actually defines this term :)
The Code of Conduct uses the term "maintainers" numerous times.
In the kernel community, a "maintainer" is anyone who is
responsible for a subsystem, driver, or file, and is listed in
the MAINTAINERS file in the kernel source tree.
So I just went with "Maintainer".
>> +* Hardware Vendor - Writing drivers for new hardware
>> +* Distribution Maintainer - Packaging kernels for distros
>> +* Agentic Coding - AI assistants working with kernel code
>
>Given the extensive split, what about normal (existing) kernel
>developers?
Those people don't read the docs anyway :p
How about something like:
Existing Kernel Developer
-------------------------
Continue advancing your kernel development expertise:
* Locking and Concurrency: Documentation/locking/index.rst
* RCU (Read-Copy Update): Documentation/RCU/index.rst
* Subsystem APIs: Documentation/driver-api/index.rst
* Performance Analysis: Documentation/trace/index.rst
* Testing Infrastructure: Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
* Patch Series Management: Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
* Maintainer Handbooks: Documentation/process/maintainer-handbooks.rst
* Cross-Architecture Development: Documentation/arch/index.rst
* Kernel Debugging: Documentation/process/debugging/kgdb.rst
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-09 23:40 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add unified configuration for coding agents Sasha Levin
2025-08-09 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] README: restructure with role-based documentation and guidelines Sasha Levin
2025-08-10 15:44 ` Joe Perches
2025-08-10 16:46 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-11 0:10 ` Joe Perches
2025-08-11 0:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-08-11 8:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-08-11 15:48 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-08-15 6:19 ` Kees Cook
2025-08-09 23:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] agents: add unified agent coding assistant configuration Sasha Levin
2025-08-10 7:01 ` Greg KH
2025-08-10 14:22 ` Sasha Levin
2025-08-14 0:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-08-15 6:23 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJoQs_5Mp7-LAtTS@lappy \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox