From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword-matching
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 22:08:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3959ab9a9d44444c06ffd0f390cf95dc6bc7f6e.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFhGd8o8ihYeML6WpiE1-=eeXC+k1yzSEdA-WJXjwB-f9VcHoA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 14:03 +0900, Justin Stitt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:46 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 04:23 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > > Add the "D:" type which behaves the same as "K:" but will only match
> > > content present in a patch file.
[]
> > > My opinion: Nack.
> >
> > I think something like this would be better
> > as it avoids duplication of K and D content.
>
> If I understand correctly, this puts the onus on the get_maintainer users
> to select the right argument whereas adding "D:", albeit with some
> duplicate code, allows maintainers themselves to decide in exactly
> which context they receive mail.
Maybe, but I doubt it'll be significantly different.
> This could all be a moot point, though, as I believe Konstantin
> is trying to separate out the whole idea of a patch-sender needing
> to specify the recipients of a patch.
As I understand it, by using get_maintainer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 4:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword matching Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword-matching Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 4:46 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-28 5:03 ` Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 5:08 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2023-09-28 19:12 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-09-28 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: migrate some K to D Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 4:49 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-28 5:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword matching Joe Perches
[not found] ` <CAFhGd8rtnvipRVAKRQAEcyGqCknVmx+bd2NMT7mCuTZjhrqULA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-09-28 6:09 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-28 15:52 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-09-29 2:07 ` Justin Stitt
2023-09-29 2:50 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-29 3:07 ` Justin Stitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3959ab9a9d44444c06ffd0f390cf95dc6bc7f6e.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox