From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7EF81EE03D; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729262185; cv=none; b=jyk4TK1d7oskGBWtY3CtbjQyLbS0MM0R3vp8E0zYzWDuyMJT39RCFUeeiRKFYBvbcb+MjpOEM1rLY1MJzTHKle87JlLcFNfXB6PXlzElMZyAvVJ1MkwXkPANeV8UNfHWv7hYMtXN5ZL2Umg5f/WBxbKRqTmCVLoiYRxYgNfWsr8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729262185; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5epDjfiMaa9pin4fteE1kp57LURHkEYKH2wIKIdpUfA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WVLg6b3ynfQXjNXcFXxRaLo+ZZ1nrL1ST2fsmgIyJTDt7mkgifjLm2x6gv7kv9EHbBL5bf/r/AJqCJBMD3fK5Cg0urHi55ThOlmfllngPdKLnIeQCpu2la6HyDqz55nhCMpxium31dUvogNA8JFtz+MWl/HOdT7jygURiXWzYPA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=FZ/8VTLh; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=XZqiu3DN; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=c7LBj9iz; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=7aUq1Maz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="FZ/8VTLh"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="XZqiu3DN"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="c7LBj9iz"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="7aUq1Maz" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75A421C99; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:36:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1729262182; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oHIFS1nc3HCPUMjfKrnrHIzz1FD8QGBIt1PbxMnXDK8=; b=FZ/8VTLh9hhjSGX/ggH4bkuGSThJ15elA2jjpi/2PLOcpbcDCJtFPUP049A/4fsvQ8cWRw vFs+EQ+JdT3mKeHd+BB7Dt/TN9KiTuYRT4a/KdzMaMj9Co+VSH3Zlw/wjqiIROa8G9sc9g YoCgt6ESMaTPNc0M2HJvohKODs96xws= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1729262182; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oHIFS1nc3HCPUMjfKrnrHIzz1FD8QGBIt1PbxMnXDK8=; b=XZqiu3DNxmNf3ZuLYZsv2hr+dgoGNeyX1zJfe53USgGGiSmHs5uayprjq9GwU1VgbMMjqS GaCCUPJEAbLvzfAQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1729262181; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oHIFS1nc3HCPUMjfKrnrHIzz1FD8QGBIt1PbxMnXDK8=; b=c7LBj9izEUAe5MMBGWhAwHDnZSeCxA9I9wkvjM7EEY2GIchIjTN6rEUle4lYKcixo5vITE TgA1jVKEOb5CKUFkf4RN9OrwvcTFAtEJu0cm9cwTKLydyxMBlo+Z+rfft6mZ96Jc/uDVXM t2MqceH17yRT+frK0GcvgQeqUzs+TUY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1729262181; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oHIFS1nc3HCPUMjfKrnrHIzz1FD8QGBIt1PbxMnXDK8=; b=7aUq1Maz5v/FiBDI0Hxuc5jcRsGtniJpGplmX/MOt33BqWtENWPglkwcV8qloanHb+ZqxC mICagdqMeAGsJMDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E6613A85; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id Ckf/MmVyEmf4OQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:36:21 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:35:21 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Gustavo Padovan Cc: David Gow , Donald Zickus , workflows , automated-testing , linux-kselftest , kernelci , Nikolai Kondrashov , kernelci-members , "laura.nao" Subject: Re: [Automated-testing] [RFC] Test catalog template Message-ID: References: <192a002ee68.e1e6c6282027214.1199547115557464780@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <192a002ee68.e1e6c6282027214.1199547115557464780@collabora.com> X-Spam-Score: -4.30 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Level: Hi! > Then there are other perspectives that crosses this. For example, many of the LTP and > kselftests will just fail, but there is no accumulated knowledge on what the result of > each test means. So understanding what is expected to pass/fail for each platform is > a sort of dependance in this extensive documentation effort we are set ourselves for. We are spending quite a lot of time to make sure LTP tests do not fail unless there is a reason to. If you see LTP tests failing and you think that they shouldn't just report it on the LTP mailing list and we will fix that. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz