From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA7E13B78A; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713890741; cv=none; b=m2Q+jdSpVXrR+qe5talMJiFFEzghC6bq3GS6jTrOLvSAKxkzC0ZDWGDptfHzBGEoXp6wCMXnRnU8GznvmRC8xF2MWNK6UvUFTL2qoBLD80Gh7O1yMHSYhDX2sQ9DAlAFUtCeN6a8DoV4UxUpIqREwevdgCoTz+1lIvKaxjtX6LU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713890741; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ylGPiC11Rh1IR0lbQDb6F+buZSZZaXAcX2MKtgj4y+E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XQKPd6xueuQlna4tQWA8Ho3gkYEWoe6pcZOn+kBZ+JowVuDPikPEZdZwlEn8ePjDgN8yKkYG3cHR7qrLYYRkTou2rlA7+mx+GhHcwg4GJb0FtkSOwVNBNI/lOPUnjWsAOXAxGhSHyj9Ao/MTAqslp2iHarQ9xs9hd1xYHZxPjhU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Br4cDyEW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Br4cDyEW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713890740; x=1745426740; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ylGPiC11Rh1IR0lbQDb6F+buZSZZaXAcX2MKtgj4y+E=; b=Br4cDyEWLtSsCNdp0+ITJgDGUXuL0fRWG/fK90BT518AWlyeNMTJqSKz i1nrCVq6qeblODyOObp6cdtA0YUN0JFDzQvPB9ZQALfsqasb/ZftgIg+N rTm/rzggoddCfSDYX6QpkWm1ulp3vGuc4UfX/gVXO9CwE+HTP0NJXDyeW rf1G1aqUEfyPcvcbyieSSIX5EqJaZvwv25Q4v5Z7n6qb3GDzoDXb/YmWU b9DnXPitzSSI/+pRPZBIqppSFdMJjZejG9eNhYV2FYLV3lwMVUZgyE8fe ZbOeNQ+nKoyiTh1b7Cd0YIb6RCF5m0kZ2OQTtH12ekATrwyTnnHjNDL00 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jXC4Fv2cT1W7je7Wkv3gkA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5IA2DsAqQxqCMUYtJivTFA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11053"; a="9706257" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="9706257" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 09:45:39 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UQl0iVxrQky/oUGb9NmS6g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RuE1ny//QJSQSHUU0wE5EA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="28916984" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 09:45:37 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rzJGx-00000000Os0-1WUN; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:45:35 +0300 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:45:35 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jani Nikula Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: process: Recommend to put Cc: tags after cutter '---' line Message-ID: References: <20240423132024.2368662-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240423132024.2368662-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871q6wrw12.fsf@intel.com> <87ttjsqbld.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ttjsqbld.fsf@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:37:34PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:30:49PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> The Cc's on the mailing list archive are harder to dig up, and do not > >> accurately reflect the same information. > > > > How comes? These Cc: are 1:1 mapped to the Cc: email headers. > > Patch Cc's get mapped to email Cc's depending on personal git sendemail > configuration. > > People can add more Cc's in the emails when sending. So, which exactly a proof why email headers are better for that, as they reflect _reality_. > Mailing list Cc's actually present in the archives depend on mailing > list manager configuration, and, in some cases, even the personal list > preferences of individual subscribers. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko