From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F5513D516; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713890794; cv=none; b=jprMI7BQfZdQr0+yXi4YB3a+YBm+e0H7vePXdwWe28fQBmgS1yoUfmCRvKTywfgq5JsYcb/E4+zDZHaMO3JL4b3bY7it5hKNpFIyrwfWCcQ/M1DoaaAmzGYMC/pntOM3lrvI/Hqi5uq3LpI4M99CFuT7j5/7iCyXXMyDrWDWetM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713890794; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X04TMGUEoTQq6ssKaWRAYwBOvxwm4/UkOVHluKDUc0A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tGRupVmhl3CXee9vUIwaQAW6iCGNYd0xlBYKA0ZJl0tHaeo572L67rJfIP0SBITPcirxJMCv6mxv45HbvManftjeLnjsc6DkdxpIt+fQulrICa3T93rAVwqp7NJsa7+GQpKTfp4ESFf86q1tubpBsR+Isl1RH8901CuzuJkIYVY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bshuNDet; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bshuNDet" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713890793; x=1745426793; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=X04TMGUEoTQq6ssKaWRAYwBOvxwm4/UkOVHluKDUc0A=; b=bshuNDetZQUu+e83KRVePRP2DDg0IGsiP0lb9ymxwaxVj73RhQ49+h+0 yaXVtc+kwkLYLGfMIYSge7TwOldsKptL19MNbNZBj0wHUI0sS9Ypmbr+u 7wm0d56dACDY7lUPm2thEmntOXnO4tuli7bdqcpQwFh3HnmAMtx219mZx 6yvbLNzPgf+4+3Z9zNSIGfhvYwtYy8QXDrHY3EnvCji4sUU14ca7d2eBH AgfW/EL9Hcd6aqZlREbdG4tUEYAnCgxgmUruI5ooBzB4VVLYK4a62fEoi YLd/BrizC4qF3q7kQAzUKDkh6eG65vXjBDmPqCXhKmkLqvb1XJ46ceqts w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cEgt2psCQ9iaVuqwsDn6bQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vTy7pJI/R1SACFn3lneJ5A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11053"; a="9318061" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="9318061" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 09:46:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fx3hzkhmRTKzdTyvq2YGIw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tQSw8qZSSl+Gasbx+7P2Uw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="24395789" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 09:46:31 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rzJHo-00000000Osh-1HrE; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:46:28 +0300 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:46:28 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Jani Nikula , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: process: Recommend to put Cc: tags after cutter '---' line Message-ID: References: <20240423132024.2368662-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240423132024.2368662-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871q6wrw12.fsf@intel.com> <878r14yw8n.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878r14yw8n.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 08:44:24AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > >> A lot of patches get sent with > >> more Cc's in the mail message than in the commit message. > > > > Note, this is the recommendation as it's stated. You can continue polluting > > the environment on your wish. > > The environmental case here is ... not strong. > > I, too, have my doubts about this recommendation; responding this way is > not going to change a lot of minds, IMO. Let's see how discussion will go. Nevertheless, there seem no objections against the first patch in the series. Can it be applied? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko