workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	security@kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: Document the Linux Kernel CVE process
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:36:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zc5ZpB6jsuTKmhv5@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024021518-stature-frightful-e7fc@gregkh>

On Thu 15-02-24 19:20:09, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:54:17PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 14-02-24 09:00:30, Greg KH wrote:
> > [...]
> > > +Process
> > > +-------
> > > +
> > > +As part of the normal stable release process, kernel changes that are
> > > +potentially security issues are identified by the developers responsible
> > > +for CVE number assignments and have CVE numbers automatically assigned
> > > +to them.  These assignments are published on the linux-cve-announce
> > > +mailing list as announcements on a frequent basis.
> > > +
> > > +Note, due to the layer at which the Linux kernel is in a system, almost
> > > +any bug might be exploitable to compromise the security of the kernel,
> > > +but the possibility of exploitation is often not evident when the bug is
> > > +fixed.  Because of this, the CVE assignment team is overly cautious and
> > > +assign CVE numbers to any bugfix that they identify.  This
> > > +explains the seemingly large number of CVEs that are issued by the Linux
> > > +kernel team.
> > 
> > Does the process focus only on assigning CVE numbers to a given upstream
> > commit(s) withou any specifics of the actual security threat covered by
> > the said CVE?
> 
> Outside of the git commit text, no, we are not going to be adding
> anything additional to the report, UNLESS someone wants to add
> additional text to it, and then we will be glad to update a CVE entry
> with the additional information.

OK, so what is the point of having CVE assigned to such a commit without
any addional information which is already referenced by the kernel sha?
What is the actual added value of that CVE?

> Here's an example of what the CVE announcement is going to look like for
> a "test" that we have been doing for our scripts
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024021353-drainage-unstuffed-a7c0@gregkh/T/#u

Thanks this gave me some idea. One worrying part is
: Please note that only supported kernel versions have fixes applied to
: them.  For a full list of currently supported kernel versions, please
: see https://www.kernel.org/

From the above it is not really clear "supported by _whom_". Because I
am pretty sure there are _fully_ supported kernels outside of that list
which are actively maintained.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14  8:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14  8:34 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2024-02-15 12:04   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 16:10     ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2024-02-15 17:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14  8:37 ` Vegard Nossum
2024-02-15 11:50   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 12:24     ` Vegard Nossum
2024-02-16  8:28       ` Jani Nikula
2024-02-16 11:22         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-16 14:58           ` Jonathan Corbet
2024-02-17 11:56             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 13:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-02-15 12:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 13:41 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2024-02-15 11:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 13:43 ` Jiri Kosina
2024-02-14 13:55   ` Mark Brown
2024-02-14 14:32     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 14:46     ` Jiri Kosina
2024-02-14 15:10       ` Mark Brown
2024-02-14 13:58   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-14 14:38     ` Jiri Kosina
2024-02-14 15:09       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15  8:17 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2024-02-15  8:43   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 17:54 ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-15 18:20   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-15 18:36     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-02-16 11:25       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-16 13:20         ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-16 15:34           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-02-16 16:51             ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-15 19:40     ` Kees Cook
2024-02-16  7:41       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zc5ZpB6jsuTKmhv5@tiehlicka \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox