From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4637C001DC for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229606AbjGZTGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:06:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53508 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbjGZTGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:06:18 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32104198D for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fbaef9871cso245157e87.0 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:06:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; t=1690398375; x=1691003175; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5ISopsp3GPjCEYylIemfLA0z3JmRG0JusuOWHSGEOLw=; b=Wyo2LaoVHtAiw2PazwAFDmQcirOzA6gP9C+wgO1nx2DyTeSWDe2UJT4YLSqbezPdXi FYtDoimOGsFJYfth3e4yqD0aQQCIlAZEvYrZJstJwIyZhZBqWxo2I2fHbgXhkZpRUsLY h0Ca7UDrIZ9c7yA/XeOF95zhnwrbRRHcS7fMo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690398375; x=1691003175; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5ISopsp3GPjCEYylIemfLA0z3JmRG0JusuOWHSGEOLw=; b=ZwvVD8HPf5/vtQrhV5EjWoVt8ikaXnHaY6q1iiaEthu8zgFlSwbN5KvPhkkYGEKkXo rH+fIfD5cK/KqZp9DnZ0R34HDOAHqNp9dliiWQcnZ2dyFJJgHZT6C9F09ngEtVE/ikCR C5lAWyPbt2fFQTS3hRNHWoFScNJvARBhDnxdyKaIq3/binWttWb1sUy/fDO4eX3e2UWh FNt0cb0Awze5AeTc+SEUlcTFWwRTqL2zubrpMXhaO4Z3Zc4Qb7ogrkHTHJwCPt4IyLpp Cq7F2KeE0acZqLL6TApfqI7zwvz5EB/x4DZ2urP3h2nlQBPNR5HmzTtD8K/pDbsAcbZn 88Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaBUDMQOD9DmbdfE+bj4CdRwhnDHq6aT+/FAukUc0E2G6OlirLN 2iaErAMT+JzJmryzOE+Ivv+hCDso//EUjysNclPKawRO X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlExfXqoAzwwGCcHmVSLqHYtu21b6VzNA+jpdf9HLQjVRE9DUv8MairpCylstG2TVVw/rnYeyg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a48:0:b0:4f9:556b:93c2 with SMTP id r8-20020ac25a48000000b004f9556b93c2mr46164lfn.1.1690398375307; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com. [209.85.167.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12-20020ac2520c000000b004f4b42e2d7dsm3360294lfl.230.2023.07.26.12.06.14 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fe04882c66so206731e87.3 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:06:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a19:c519:0:b0:4fb:c0b5:63d4 with SMTP id w25-20020a19c519000000b004fbc0b563d4mr42636lfe.43.1690398373839; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:06:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230726151515.1650519-1-kuba@kernel.org> <11ec5b3819ff17c7013348b766eab571eee5ca96.camel@perches.com> <20230726092312.799503d6@kernel.org> <20230726112031.61bd0c62@kernel.org> <20230726114817.1bd52d48@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:05:56 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: get_maintainer: steer people away from using file paths To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Joe Perches , Krzysztof Kozlowski , geert@linux-m68k.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 11:59, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > You're already using 'patchwork'. Why don't you instead go "Oh, *that* > tool isn't doing the right thing?" Christ. Looking around, patchwork *ALREADY DOES THIS*. Except it looks like it might be set up to just complain ("netdev/cc_maintainers"). Which seems to be why you're complaining. IOW, you're complaining about *another* tool, because your own tool use is set up to complain instead of being helpful. I'm now even more convinced that that warning is completely bogus. No way in hell am *I* going to bend over backwards and add some stupid new rule to my workflow because *you* use a tool that is a whining little complaint-machine instead of just *fixing* the problem. Guys, tools are supposed to *help*, not just whine about technicalities and make it harder for everybody else. So just fix your tool. Don't complain about *my* use of another tool. Linus