[PATCH] TASK :Linux Kernel Bug Fixing: Fixing Warning/Spelling checks on the rst file

[rujra <braker.noob.kernel@gmail.com>]

TASK : Documentation Task
removed warnings and added "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0"
in starting of the file , also instead of using re-use , have used
reuse.

Signed-off-by: Rujra Bhatt <braker.noob.kernel@gmail.com>
<rujrabhatt3@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
index 906c47f1a9e5..17652610450d 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 .. _addsyscalls:

 Adding a New System Call
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ then the flags argument should include a value
that is equivalent to setting
 the timing window between ``xyzzy()`` and calling
 ``fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)``, where an unexpected ``fork()`` and
 ``execve()`` in another thread could leak a descriptor to
-the exec'ed program. (However, resist the temptation to re-use the actual value
+the exec'ed program. (However, resist the temptation to reuse the actual value
 of the ``O_CLOEXEC`` constant, as it is architecture-specific and is part of a
 numbering space of ``O_*`` flags that is fairly full.)

@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ the compatibility wrapper::
     ...
     555   x32      xyzzy     __x32_compat_sys_xyzzy

-If no pointers are involved, then it is preferable to re-use the 64-bit system
+If no pointers are involved, then it is preferable to reuse the 64-bit system
 call for the x32 ABI (and consequently the entry in
 arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl is unchanged).

--
2.43.0