From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC832586C2 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2026 22:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767306817; cv=none; b=cLiuPg87OG7NM0c8yzBempZ5HCVx+T/95yysF2IqwCyjfFzAeB4t5tjKnq2tp62tQNT6XWKh8i/k1CkJJLfqwkY74I2KJNv2HGNdd3PflRfvUHd/Y3NN6hfKIZUt8zqDHGzGeo/CD8LW7jXcRzySi6YX5TzR+JbiEZe2UeoXdkk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767306817; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UXGKdezBnhqWJT3z28AVcODOOBkRsqGWkgI6uf542F4=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=OpfAYazRcUc8SjUdhh+BkxXxQZMPD4QGEyG+D9hd+8IZKCUjjAjRx3m1OL9Qr8vMUpccp/2voWe5WovmZAwMKs3l98IAOPjdhAWlAgHFFsRywh9lzLYN819Hd+nih0aqy7uy7LiojPIwfUQBwnnldcZBj2reY/H67MgJcJ30cIM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K8BtYGxL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K8BtYGxL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F7A1C19423 for ; Thu, 1 Jan 2026 22:33:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767306817; bh=UXGKdezBnhqWJT3z28AVcODOOBkRsqGWkgI6uf542F4=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=K8BtYGxL5UrgFaeruJ2bYpsWno6NCzwubi/XDjFvI+iHYbQvO3xnO0Y7wyhj2cCLP VaKgc3w0IX4QpiURYPgms9c4pkzF8tbO1vcMDyjBiUnBRL8v90Jjd/by7AwRJFPhNC YjgEEgIlWtpX14PD2WYaQmPm6VsfJDvCvmPi/pFWu5LWuaBGcjnvxbyDCSguflNbtq VNEjL1IEIzAE2Wf4+e33ukYHmF/6wWLuvhZScRrjR43mYuQq2dp3Nxhbo/NKUeE0NA MG2XkD6FMCKMY5fQWnAdIQG4AnKuPbokMsi6dCmbx6jOG1HNMPe7ucmUeCczCATjh3 4INYWRS+JrrrA== Received: by mail-yw1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-78c6a53187dso87850047b3.2 for ; Thu, 01 Jan 2026 14:33:37 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUYmHRWGuL1i6819qUOJzxWS4/rxaBZWCw/cAoAnLja5To9qSNJ3QTRn3T3B5azOE3zjGfVpUQqEE0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyMlSMDyseJEQQk+dBwA5mdGUV6zyPWlhEjANkcQVHJgfMTi07V eNKhPHX6NYGpSn8gOEWD4bhMFpFs72Fub8RcNvg4+AtuB4C8je7jGpLwZ6VUI2kduUTA08AFjqj CAqpfYz7sKrCK89gPe20V+GDQWF/mWZk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEBLNKuoraxNZDnarHv/8QNfjLvaAF0ad1d03H/wN5pMxpPWQbhNg4O3Lwnms+Q6/yKd55/WFSt9fl6Hz8W+0k= X-Received: by 2002:a53:bacd:0:b0:63f:b0a3:7400 with SMTP id 956f58d0204a3-6466a9133c5mr22966072d50.66.1767306816672; Thu, 01 Jan 2026 14:33:36 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20251223142726.73417-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <20251223142726.73417-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2026 23:33:25 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: AQt7F2pNYT3pv7P7qW-qHrpoGWDYRLqHE5UdSIokYzrI55tQFL698Vhw1A_9duc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: Be more explicit about defconfig To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alexandre Belloni , Linus Walleij , Drew Fustini , Jonathan Corbet , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, soc@lists.linux.dev, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 3:27=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > It is already documented but people still send noticeable amount of > patches ignoring the rule - get_maintainers.pl does not work on > arm64/configs/defconfig or any other shared ARM defconfig. > > Be more explicit, that one must not rely on typical/simple approach > here for getting To/Cc list. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Despite the complaints that the patch does not fix the problem there is nothing wrong with the patch. Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij