From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870D5C10F14 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBC520854 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=cmpwn.com header.i=@cmpwn.com header.b="dT7/xjNH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728607AbfJOS35 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:29:57 -0400 Received: from mail.cmpwn.com ([45.56.77.53]:60632 "EHLO mail.cmpwn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727179AbfJOS34 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:29:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn; t=1571164196; bh=Sn+LMPWk9B4lxhOqdlMnYeiXy1Y1W28Gvp6e+tTmpzM=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=dT7/xjNHm7w/aAAI1zZ+tQzWCm8EBuyWP2gaIKt9UJRj+qMUcOH/CHkw/u6zbVOB4 Zg9e32Sg+R3e2TRzrZYJZxz2sGlhX3tfLo/b0EgPR/hlkg4MDKPirAyDtiMWfy1d8T lrlNI1PSK8o+D/Hq5cY4fkVjIMnGC0W4hFqlrnK8= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <20191015182642.GA1137327@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:29:55 -0400 To: "Greg KH" Cc: Subject: Re: Emailing patchsets from the web on git.sr.ht From: "Drew DeVault" Message-Id: Sender: workflows-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On Tue Oct 15, 2019 at 8:26 PM Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:15:40PM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote: > > Future improvements will include closer linkage with mailing lists, > > suggested recipients, other stuff. Thoughts? >=20 > It looks nice! >=20 > Only thought I had was it seemed that the individual commit messages > were done twice? Once when you did the commit and once when you sent > them out? Or am I watching that wrong? There are two steps, selecting the earliest commit and selecting the latest one. This is used so you can specify a range of commits. It's a little bit unintuitive, but this is necessary to meet a core promise of Sourcehut, which is that every feature works without JavaScript. I may later reduce this to one step by using optional JavaScript, we'll see. It's a bit more intuitive when you're making your way through the UI yourself, I think. If anyone here gives it a shot and has feedback to send my way, I would be pleased to hear it.