From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D55EB64DC for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 07:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229555AbjGQHt2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2023 03:49:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51180 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229965AbjGQHt1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jul 2023 03:49:27 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB2CDE; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C6960F90; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 07:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6E2DC433C9; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 07:49:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689580155; bh=waKWJVOAVBelCCI1mB4poaxnZoLxRarS05iTbEu+fGg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=ETvDL7REf0/QLPjSciqioJlqT1+t33+n0MsHYt3ZS5nlqHjalFVSULyueWDSepJDZ a46DVAA3dKgwxAjvszYB+hLxtPJD1X/rgMNPtfuf5hdqn2jsiKrzSrJfDhNHwRSJg6 V0Uh9d0cJBX0uREL+nV3SHHXKD/coZHG4MNLn11h9ZkEKXvFzKsjo+zSsKHvYkdH3v fHlC6qyQk6G2/u5DWApyL3KQk622YrhFo0WZP/Mibs0WahAhiJlvWHs+726a2EyFVz 3ura9Lcwiw7xZvHtGYlm8Xcl0CQ3PuZi0qM9x//tPcN/a7n49IXmpXwBaKsRgV32Qe xgne2JMBU4bAQ== Message-ID: <895ed8ae-e93f-b296-330e-356cda698de2@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:49:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH docs] docs: maintainer: document expectations of small time maintainers Content-Language: en-US To: Linux regressions mailing list , Jakub Kicinski Cc: corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Mark Brown References: <20230713223432.1501133-1-kuba@kernel.org> <6f1014cd-f8c5-f935-dcc7-4f5a6b85e473@kernel.org> <20230714101028.337fb39a@kernel.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On 15/07/2023 12:31, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > [CCing other people in the thread] > How about something like this: > > ``` > Bug reports > ----------- > > Maintainers must ensure severe problems in their code reported to them > are resolved in a timely manner: security vulnerabilities, regressions, > compilation errors, data loss, kernel crashes, and bugs of similar scope. > > Maintainers furthermore should respond to reports about other kind of > bugs as well, if the report is of reasonable quality or indicates a > problem that might be severe -- especially if they have *Supported* > status of the codebase in the MAINTAINERS file. I like mentioning the "Supported" part. We should be a bit more understanding to all folks who are not paid to do this. Best regards, Krzysztof