From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7A3533D6; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761585384; cv=none; b=VbwtR7fVOf6lChLBY6Ew2c9t5o3amiCxcAEfvWcrr7jbjkm3ogqVwWgb4BfFEK45Njf3UYO/DO+y91C4Z+c+xBtD6FXkS9evebT0oyHjXIozB2pKPyD8h5FYXH6L1NueXAusIKyFOLesNG8jnv48jRY47Hpt1Vw+5Ux8Yd+6yGY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761585384; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SGpo5zbLkYNSYLhZSQlZopf0gXlOu07LHyQlsl9f/yo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rgthbgqwgM0hEvkWHg2OkCi4sS1a8jsMk2irThW94eXWhy9BEm3Yx48UYo7A9sBz7RNgfMkTZKnGEItymrAuUWIyVumnWRUW2QANuwON4ppZ8PzDgOklWc+s+SA6098I6tV76HCRChWHVVjRT0oQR6gPHa/PWK9+yftAA0s9Po4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=s//7eFe2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="s//7eFe2" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 8252E406FB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1761585382; bh=4AJkw0JNiYt/C/Q0w7OHk2noFttalBttxGpAF09CdDM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=s//7eFe2ZlRxqEGUnYz7qSLdLireCzjsBeXes20zIZK7P6e356dtfgfxHq8uJB4K8 x8hO7shSOQMM8wmEYHtvgAyKsS+ZQ+W3uZoX1g1hLsqxXWvT+P6QCJAxhqba5MZfoU jhAIcbOdImOHUqsg5wGPYpqleaxTEX7VlHUmz8g1OMDiKeStlQrm2K9sxBfXkg8fw8 MF91Y1aO6dfMLnbzyG4XPcib1rv2sOPuRTTyjzvtxcmSAHbVVXAUexM27OnNhP5pWL Bcs79RgDT7WPmMfa7ydl9W/DsKB6Xag0cUz45rFU99jiZtMemRi6U8nB/Y3sAtuH68 MQ8+/pTZbu/cg== Received: from localhost (c-73-14-55-248.hsd1.co.comcast.net [73.14.55.248]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8252E406FB; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:16:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] docs: reporting-issues: rework In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:16:21 -0600 Message-ID: <87zf9cnu3e.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thorsten Leemhuis writes: > I worked on-and-off on this for maybe two years and the problem is: > what started as fine tuning in various places piled up. That together > with the newly added links & anchors and some text movements makes the > patchset huge. When you ignore those two aspects and look at individual > patches using a word diff algorithm it looks a lot less scary, but it > remains big =E2=80=93 and thus sadly puts some load on reviewers and > translators. Sorry. I think it's worth it and tried to split things up > to facilitate handling. It is indeed a lot, it's going to be hard to get people (including me) to look at it all. I think you should really consider breaking this into smaller sets and getting them through one at a time... I'll look at a few of these, but certainly won't get through the whole set today. Thanks, jon P.S. Grumbling aside, it's good to have you back...