From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619481DB546; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728321512; cv=none; b=IQ9Lcd7jO+QJ4Wc5qGLERSck0ClZwoKPL0OLAaPIegkI/Um784GTgVtjzPufF7hCnhORst3XmfPdkV1FNjsbQCOhCRT9Lktk38WnOihEkW2nWBUIFNZ1sN9fm/FVKWqoF00HO1ft7STtyrKFKNfwIOz4rxOB/tY7aSrqee005Vo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728321512; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3LTfuYu4ptTly0D1CFUPRibsKkUxyUcKs8NYOTFP0rI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EWN7EDpnTWyZuT939Kf2mVvhCUZnIYLXpqrRRMp6x/KUaJxF87NwQZnOqqdNbAo3ydUiQruRWKy+v5WoeRTdzA0HuaRwKT2fr6+3LxKMDhOXowy95/wKeaPUlCAudBLo8L2Q9TQ3TIahst7pyhYsvfAhT1nZ4tOMnebqge0o14Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=PcpK827L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="PcpK827L" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7CD7A42B38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1728321510; bh=hTbYvMb5tsOMwHIvNP75oAkkBAxDjbl5tpz5FI0uoao=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=PcpK827LXbljCvRrtxo/YFpiG2+smBE9A0zL0H5alTUYXd793HZuZclsmUraUExtn YJ1Rscr0agWY8voEngovTM8f3bmUUziMfBZCp+ZQytTcDBUsO64i30I2Lc7EapRGbx h5BXMzomm5cvwHlJSBIC0ExUNQfJD2REkTR02JgJvDCJ6YLLZLsi6jU+Xk30kUTFbl CW9u3Dlj5uF1Gxy8OdNHB5KHrYI+uIVwoVVeBlkhylEdulmhgpMAqAAQ10f2TSdqz0 kHSS74EeZUITZRkjF0invso2Bn0UOgS4cQ0LGOwp+8UAOiI3z4Vd4UO+VUpkGgF1pA MAWS5i9nLCi6Q== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CD7A42B38; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:18:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , soc@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Belloni , Will Deacon , Kevin Hilman , Palmer Dabbelt , Geert Uytterhoeven , Conor Dooley , Heiko =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=BCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: clarify submitting patches In-Reply-To: <20240925095635.30452-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> References: <20240925095635.30452-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:18:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87wmijj0gq.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Krzysztof Kozlowski writes: > Patches for SoCs are expected to be picked up by SoC submaintainers. > The main SoC maintainers should be addressed only in few cases. > > Rewrite the section about maintainer handling to document above > expectation. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Cc: Linus Walleij > Cc: Alexandre Belloni > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven > Cc: Conor Dooley > Cc: Heiko St=C3=BCbner > > --- > > During our LPC ad-hoc BoF, we discussed improving Maintainer SoC docs > and I think I volunteered to write something. The trouble is that > whatever I won't write in my notes, escapes my memory. > > I believe this is what we discussed. Was there anything more to > write/document? > > Changes in v2: > 1. Fix missing closing ) (Conor). > 2. Style changes (in point 3.). > 3. Soften note that soc@kernel is not for discussing ("is usually not"). > --- > Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon