From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10BAF2475F7; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754931507; cv=none; b=bTBnU4yfQzLp9HnTPAjZtklHmUqCEU5BRYVIVqgqbSMwWA8OmlA6LBEr7MpN4MqCEJkZcsULxH2ZRencRJFa2N+eCiDLgxk4QJ5eUf2RafQYjillwWEhh/X+bVN6PeJMRwFH0BWRjvOryl/Mtw/7ba4PvDpvkisCvDX6IYx6uus= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754931507; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s8sJQCvJnnwhwG/zK25BcN86IJQZukvadbAUwCn4JiI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZjpWi4PfBG3rdWMi771167U+LHEllNbXPJTCbO4p3xV0icJh8+Ruj0Lwh2AtcGNMigHYiDtFsgdlHmGUOnRrVgWWVMLj740fen1L+IM+pgVzFr1qIHizIymAXnee63x6CFHP7v8dE8cC3Oil9WT+JKsgyhpnyRwcJFZPUzFYAgw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=RHPyOIB9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="RHPyOIB9" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 00AC540AD2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1754931505; bh=s8sJQCvJnnwhwG/zK25BcN86IJQZukvadbAUwCn4JiI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=RHPyOIB97o9zYE5zgKAjwERhjV0FIYvKDiU/P7cvnOyo9CD2kM9GxUAhWC5M7VXsv 9Otu4nZn5gRaq2Ease72iQNBk5jJELcxrWI0iXnL44OD5E/3msEpoA3JMfbFyus+Sk nFzrwNn1wRt5esNzffpaVmKnTTq9P2HS2O+dT4q6XqScFs3HFzXxQ8CTR0eQixbFuv vrWc4nyREql25hI/YxZ09S9N6qkqmJzhhPtqRNdt/+3WYxS39UHVOS7GoKCS2Uwra4 KyNSMf3m4Tog50bYfNkRJhKp4D8m5gdDjCr1Ol+zIxKYfqCQzuJuRyxxaAnbFpiWU/ dIY6jMJcaf6gA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00AC540AD2; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:58:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa , workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Better handle and document Python needs for Kernel build In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 10:58:24 -0600 Message-ID: <87pld1eqxb.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > It follows the second version of this small series. It contains > missing patches from the python backward-compatibility series. Applied, thanks. jon