From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D37C77B7A for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 13:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231259AbjFFNqf (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:46:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34726 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236774AbjFFNqe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:46:34 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04FAFE6B; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949E4627CE; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 13:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 170F9C433EF; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1686059193; bh=68eaGrLGrnORDP1z2Q9crKD3m6oo24cQZZ0jGyTzM9g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oWB9VCBzGWlONboGUB2EfG9Dpzthr9066iDyJx6GNNpEi4Zfwl5Gu0tYTMMmnJpdk pmm3kAY+jeWGHqKKt5VyzWzzmnyRhMR8Cj87ISDaRjMWSko7WO+uBmeSEGYhi5y4py z6Rqimlc+UD62AyS1YplgBIDcGeqTM/8wE1mIQZ7vxC3dryFTv1HRm8E7bSClm6qLc CIHxj/SM5muMKaf6mq6YZyJ/ShZ0BdS3Hh9KQp/n9+36ObkIMNhq+8Kx8TODcTCLaa efx8uSFDZdWVxLFF4hxA+xI+uUkXyPrehTB/4LKWCcUQBkPxfdeZPs9qSnuAfyCqO1 3eav54GnVKIfA== From: Kalle Valo To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Willy Tarreau , Randy Dunlap , James Seo , Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] docs: process: Send patches 'To' maintainers and 'Cc' lists References: <20230603151447.29288-1-james@equiv.tech> <975d35cb-e0aa-8ea7-5520-238d1aa4cbaf@infradead.org> <20230603160659.GA5182@1wt.eu> <20230604112644.49ac2035@kernel.org> <20230605041258.GA22604@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <87v8g2hwm1.fsf@kernel.org> <20230605103029.3fb821db@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 16:46:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20230605103029.3fb821db@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:30:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87ilc0itzi.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:22:46 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: >> > Note that some maintainers process pull requests from patchwork, not >> > from their mailbox, and prefer not to be aadressed in the To or CC >> > headers. I don't know how widespread that is. >> >> FWIW I belong to this group and prefer not be in To or Cc, I'll always >> check the patch from patchwork. > > Ah, I didn't realize this. So no action needed for this, I'm sure I'm in a very small minority and I can handle the mails with my filters just fine. Just wanted to comment that such maintainers do exist. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches