From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9697938AC72; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774888370; cv=none; b=GWkHdWcVi2GkFp40YqhZbgf8eyUyjkpLmmaEVfADbmITvTj+WR3TfL0bnMz44ogMIwqKMxTsC7hjQk/iXrBMSLQcphS/BDmN0MKCQe6CmdTfy6z0pk+cweI7AeZ03lKRt2VZZ/rmKxSbZg1Eoyr9p5BHSna/dRtnt10ur7uQjrA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774888370; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DowcYXHxw1UIQQz6dcPkMptzAoGH4rhEct4cPw+hFt4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BSyLZ7sMxD1TTOi/h+iEZVtRUkIVhV6OuW8Tos8XUXigdMZaxPyh+N6SkSa1XDQfK9EXdaPTmB88BiXKmtXA/lxXGyoQ+vnrKAVrO8F+EW9sEFqIq11IDUi+8sd9SvL4fm5xEmNzNelMup+wFWSEXae3/5KaaiYOPeDhlRQSaNc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=mo/6LVzl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="mo/6LVzl" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net D44BF411C2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1774888369; bh=nHdBxnP2sDRdgVVbbxueF/m0R+DAYFtw31BMb0IpMbo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mo/6LVzlCAvSTvzvecZYIAx+a7F8+OFkn/D55z2a2oDZT3tdNIEppPTqaqpTvkI7l CqY0K35qyk2sy6HvmE4WWgCaWeVtptwtoJjlli8IjSjC42ZY7CZVBhjERiDcEMr7Ee kgm/1/+yoRRKAINb2rdYCW3OVMK0W9PgFYb3g/oPa5hsXEr14B1cpqAQIX4CI93k5P eobvbJ/TxBm15i3nfZO7yT++Bv/aQJoPD97wyCqQPDEzdAwek3gev+up/zaNOjvl/3 nRToAcCixTbXUu7wuRPvIPYmrBMhAc11PZvniZwYnWWujqsAKy6GtYAZkM/40NkJ9L ukG/u8NrkYe2A== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D44BF411C2; Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:32:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Manuel Ebner , Collin Funk , Shuah Khan Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manuel Ebner Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] workflow, scripts: sort changes.rst and ver_linux In-Reply-To: <20260325194326.77923-2-manuelebner@mailbox.org> References: <20260325194326.77923-2-manuelebner@mailbox.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:32:47 -0600 Message-ID: <87fr5hnuq8.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Manuel Ebner writes: > restructured the patch series into logical changes. > fixed changelogs, but i'm not super content. > > [v4] -> [v5]: > undo "remove (optional)" from [v4] > merged patches with same concepts > [PATCH v4 1/4], [PATCH v4 2/4] -> [PATCH v5 1/2] > [PATCH v4 3/4], [PATCH v4 4/4] -> [PATCH v5 2/2] > fix changelogs for the individual patches OK, I have applied this series. For any future changes, though, I really need you to work on your changelogs. The 0/N cover letter should describe what the series as a whole does, you didn't do that here. For the individual patches, I have rewritten the changelogs; I'll reply to each with what I've done. Thanks, jon