From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBED32F068C; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 18:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769366432; cv=none; b=nR+67fF+skAYiZBD0bQ1BfhJlCEol8edp4H0pzMeeB++mCn84m83aLarN1mGYkpeJrjr1sV4OHiYOQTNM1eGNEbdIYV26/naqjpbdlHsd+/DhiqxGWR7KBV4JkvJ/0saOG4N6T/2KRNskdnwce+gRO+QYKFpVbWDDH53H1ZDWQ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769366432; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k0zIsDDirduC1T/Zy9Rie5eliNLSn89gCShZi0Glsp0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IUxnrs9tue6qRYB/DVSUPhjm5xXRUX4Dy/6Vmh7w68o/VDXIQoc97qzhL0qx+LdNSr0VPJmYSQZzpDWw9s+JriRKTmpqMarY+kTbmy9/GqMawUOyWCdCOZ/qGNsntfgqlRQ/HzIucYZtnkHr4nI/VcdOM6bak7LATFEYF7693B0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=fsASiqm+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="fsASiqm+" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net C989A40B0C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1769366430; bh=EkqR8AfHdMFHnzuWmmZ2wY0NlPxqrI33UUDv9469iII=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=fsASiqm+NqSRf6Nj0DG0yxe/1BXZrj0b1/WvlRubLD0LTWK2A27y6pczt2E0SlOYC 4azJlPsS5GQMy7Bnk6amP/db3ciS1uVR5RT26IPP12cL+evmCOTkNUX/+OMHZ9VRdc 3vxpdkM+KPlU9ST/A+0QAbsbHEenDkiZhoMh3sZAUU3nEHkLhmMHxWcGZ5fbVmiApR om08NjSscVBwPn1yCYGskho48cqeuzI76micC03f9MLAEeUe+9crju5yxmzzGJZnBP nPcWx9v74CvHJORKBLSipXFB6D76dKEaaKi0i/OmT5A+HgdPuI6+ayC3Y0cCQcbY0A 3jsmybl13UnNQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C989A40B0C; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 18:40:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: John Ashrith , workflows@vger.kernel.org Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: clarify CC list guidance wording In-Reply-To: <0bb5ad12-dd5a-4280-bf6e-7d1ddb59dd9e@gmail.com> References: <0bb5ad12-dd5a-4280-bf6e-7d1ddb59dd9e@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 11:40:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87ecndedsy.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain John Ashrith writes: > Changes since v3: > - Add proper changelog text > - Move version notes below the --- line > - Send as plain text to avoid mail client mangling > > From 1de01779d580e104bea0148409c3c8c76d204c41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: John Ashrith > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 14:48:28 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] docs: clarify CC list guidance wording Again ... the above text should not be in the changelog. I can certainly edit it out on applying the patch, but you really need to find a way to send patches that don't make maintainers do extra work. I'll say again: please practice sending to yourself until this comes out right, then resend your patch to the lists. Thanks, jon