* [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
@ 2025-09-22 7:42 Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 12:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-10-14 15:15 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2025-09-22 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Documentation, Linux Kernel Workflows
Cc: Jonathan Corbet, Dante Strock, Randy Dunlap, Bagas Sanjaya
The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future),
arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade.
Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
numbering scheme.
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v1 [1]:
* Arbitrarily bump major number rather than replacing it with placeholder
(Jon)
* Apply proofreading corrections (Randy)
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20250913015147.9544-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com/
Documentation/process/2.Process.rst | 40 ++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst b/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
index ef3b116492df08..bbd955d91df0cd 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
@@ -13,24 +13,18 @@ how the process works is required in order to be an effective part of it.
The big picture
---------------
-The kernel developers use a loosely time-based release process, with a new
-major kernel release happening every two or three months. The recent
-release history looks like this:
+The Linux kernel uses a loosely time-based, rolling release development model.
+A new major kernel release (9.x) [1]_ happens every two or three months, which
+comes with new features, internal API changes, and more. A typical release
+can contain about 13,000 changesets with changes to several hundred thousand
+lines of code. Recent releases, along with their dates, can be found at
+`Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_version_history>`_.
- ====== =================
- 5.0 March 3, 2019
- 5.1 May 5, 2019
- 5.2 July 7, 2019
- 5.3 September 15, 2019
- 5.4 November 24, 2019
- 5.5 January 6, 2020
- ====== =================
-
-Every 5.x release is a major kernel release with new features, internal
-API changes, and more. A typical release can contain about 13,000
-changesets with changes to several hundred thousand lines of code. 5.x is
-the leading edge of Linux kernel development; the kernel uses a
-rolling development model which is continually integrating major changes.
+.. [1] Strictly speaking, the Linux kernel does not use semantic versioning
+ number scheme, but rather the 9.x pair identifies major release
+ version as a whole number. For each release, x is incremented,
+ but 9 is incremented only if x is deemed large enough (e.g.
+ Linux 5.0 is released following Linux 4.20).
A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the
merging of patches for each release. At the beginning of each development
@@ -48,9 +42,9 @@ detail later on).
The merge window lasts for approximately two weeks. At the end of this
time, Linus Torvalds will declare that the window is closed and release the
-first of the "rc" kernels. For the kernel which is destined to be 5.6,
+first of the "rc" kernels. For the kernel which is destined to be 9.x,
for example, the release which happens at the end of the merge window will
-be called 5.6-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to
+be called 9.x-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to
merge new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next
kernel has begun.
@@ -99,13 +93,13 @@ release is made. In the real world, this kind of perfection is hard to
achieve; there are just too many variables in a project of this size.
There comes a point where delaying the final release just makes the problem
worse; the pile of changes waiting for the next merge window will grow
-larger, creating even more regressions the next time around. So most 5.x
-kernels go out with a handful of known regressions though, hopefully, none
-of them are serious.
+larger, creating even more regressions the next time around. So most kernels
+go out with a handful of known regressions, though, hopefully, none of them
+are serious.
Once a stable release is made, its ongoing maintenance is passed off to the
"stable team," currently Greg Kroah-Hartman. The stable team will release
-occasional updates to the stable release using the 5.x.y numbering scheme.
+occasional updates to the stable release using the 9.x.y numbering scheme.
To be considered for an update release, a patch must (1) fix a significant
bug, and (2) already be merged into the mainline for the next development
kernel. Kernels will typically receive stable updates for a little more
base-commit: 348011753d99b146c190aae262ee361d03cb0c5e
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
2025-09-22 7:42 [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2025-09-22 12:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-22 14:01 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-14 15:15 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2025-09-22 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Documentation,
Linux Kernel Workflows
Cc: Dante Strock, Randy Dunlap, Bagas Sanjaya
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future),
> arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade.
>
> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
> numbering scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Just FYI, I've pretty much shut docs down for the upcoming merge window.
I'm probably not the only one.
Thanks,
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
2025-09-22 12:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2025-09-22 14:01 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 14:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2025-09-22 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Documentation,
Linux Kernel Workflows
Cc: Dante Strock, Randy Dunlap
On 9/22/25 19:53, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
>> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
>> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
>> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future),
>> arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade.
>>
>> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
>> numbering scheme.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
>
> Just FYI, I've pretty much shut docs down for the upcoming merge window.
> I'm probably not the only one.
>
So it is slated for 6.19 then?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
2025-09-22 14:01 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2025-09-22 14:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-22 22:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2025-09-22 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Documentation,
Linux Kernel Workflows
Cc: Dante Strock, Randy Dunlap
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/22/25 19:53, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
>>> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
>>> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
>>> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future),
>>> arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade.
>>>
>>> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
>>> numbering scheme.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
>>
>> Just FYI, I've pretty much shut docs down for the upcoming merge window.
>> I'm probably not the only one.
>>
>
> So it is slated for 6.19 then?
If it's not in docs-next (or some other subsystem tree) now then yes, it
will wait another cycle. We are at -rc7, after all.
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
2025-09-22 14:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2025-09-22 22:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2025-09-22 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Documentation,
Linux Kernel Workflows
Cc: Dante Strock, Randy Dunlap
On 9/22/25 21:07, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So it is slated for 6.19 then?
>
> If it's not in docs-next (or some other subsystem tree) now then yes, it
> will wait another cycle. We are at -rc7, after all.
>
OK, thanks!
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
2025-09-22 7:42 [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 12:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2025-10-14 15:15 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2025-10-14 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bagas Sanjaya, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Documentation,
Linux Kernel Workflows
Cc: Dante Strock, Randy Dunlap, Bagas Sanjaya
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future),
> arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade.
>
> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
> numbering scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
I made a minor tweak to make it clear that 9.x is an example; applied,
thanks.
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-14 15:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-22 7:42 [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 12:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-22 14:01 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 14:07 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-22 22:23 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-14 15:15 ` Jonathan Corbet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox