workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Workflows <workflows@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dante Strock <dantestrock@hotmail.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: process: Arbitrarily bump kernel major version number
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 08:07:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy7i8tsj.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff092ff5-8ee1-4e91-b7f7-e5beb1d6d759@gmail.com>

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> On 9/22/25 19:53, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> The big picture section of 2.Process.rst currently hardcodes major
>>> version number to 5 since fb0e0ffe7fc8e0 ("Documentation: bring process
>>> docs up to date"). As it can get outdated when it is actually
>>> incremented (the recent is 6 and will be 7 in the near future),
>>> arbitrarily bump it to 9, giving a headroom for a decade.
>>>
>>> Note that the version number examples are kept to illustrate the
>>> numbering scheme.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
>> 
>> Just FYI, I've pretty much shut docs down for the upcoming merge window.
>> I'm probably not the only one.
>> 
>
> So it is slated for 6.19 then?

If it's not in docs-next (or some other subsystem tree) now then yes, it
will wait another cycle.  We are at -rc7, after all.

jon

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-22 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-22  7:42 Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 12:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-22 14:01   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-22 14:07     ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2025-09-22 22:23       ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-10-14 15:15 ` Jonathan Corbet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cy7i8tsj.fsf@trenco.lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=dantestrock@hotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox