From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0141B8F5E; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713883476; cv=none; b=Ng+MkzttRR9o9sc54BqJo6hUA5iTjSYEo2O01Kvi5sG9zByMEQXV7Gw24WOdDUTE3H9SuZLWS3gbRBqaVUhZbJ5uDg7YezU8V2/bg6nmwK1htYoBUfn7WJ08eGl8zX5jiZhKEGCsRLJXsG7roHLoni9CMGPDoH6DzSL739QAnsQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713883476; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pLbxaU0AKdPvsF6TD0ECcoKEmob8RZhh6JpyucudSCE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rC2oNe3n3SBsgW8vJ1/MkVG/LAk+lAPxrNkyeCZsz0T3eJk/DND8oLf4sTCAAeNPFWyLygvsrrXrjuLy/52AWNbRsYXzYh2ggIPT4imM4oBbHO1qremB8rhuwjOybY3ayUx3b2gU6brwM0g6i6Pz4uiMkcTKGKhEFTjcESUN2BI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=meaQqK4b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="meaQqK4b" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net E98B147C41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1713883466; bh=pLbxaU0AKdPvsF6TD0ECcoKEmob8RZhh6JpyucudSCE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=meaQqK4bg5NDlvMOio4WWPgkLTkcdI3yQoQBi3hF84WFoUXUOxDoeyMgD8PE6AN6o 97nmneXBxp5I94Vb5tAjHU4/fesP8IyRKhWWHRzoSu4NcI1ZhgTzuBh3yF70M2r67l aSyBf4V1l85Z+bss8RrFD+pnWZ9bP2/hDxKwmbk10phqBGqjTBHYzqC4UBO4TBAvdJ isOZBtyZwaoAaVLsaZ1D1cIRcr4Q34EnyerQNPwiSCyt5Lu4Cb1nE1/1hmm8x3oPXJ ogXtLAY0BsK0ib9+ydGSZyJ63BM0kkONRln89KCCC7ahERv+dfA6cLisxd7T9xzx4V kypCvw0HoeJ0g== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E98B147C41; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:44:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Andy Shevchenko , Jani Nikula Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: process: Recommend to put Cc: tags after cutter '---' line In-Reply-To: References: <20240423132024.2368662-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240423132024.2368662-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871q6wrw12.fsf@intel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:44:24 -0600 Message-ID: <878r14yw8n.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Andy Shevchenko writes: >> A lot of patches get sent with >> more Cc's in the mail message than in the commit message. > > Note, this is the recommendation as it's stated. You can continue polluting > the environment on your wish. The environmental case here is ... not strong. I, too, have my doubts about this recommendation; responding this way is not going to change a lot of minds, IMO. Thanks, jon