From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D78816D33A; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:34:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719441284; cv=none; b=CzAbZ9QUP3GCnHG4v0xZeGifNhMp0Da1DD5iX5usmPJBYMhCJcByfYuSL4qZ/jO8CRiBbn9G43ppCrJjGzeNGTnYAoa9EyK6nR/N9ylrq5sTnfdDBlFWI31mwdOas9/mp2bgUhXDokzG8PnwpIIZqKPwJdYSs7kH07auvWv3cuI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719441284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/D23BNJJrMHedj1VDlfPxn1b8cpcMtjGEKw2trHD+fw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qlirq5/EKLrg/E1mZJpkLpXcCNZaFJ6YpUGiARdyWEwGahD4FzbhXHqeopJM4li489azBKYZwRoi0EKmOhgdtmCEIZYlqpoC2krqyH1qPJhfp3ciQpoZl7r2Tp3WgDVqK4PPUPv9AWtudZIxwJdwoUyi2g0zD76Ok75heWfbqQ4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=HPD+KyCU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="HPD+KyCU" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7859345E2B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1719441282; bh=gMOPHcarQixtV+jPYg5ZGtLbw0+AFN5Ero2NvFfEWDk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=HPD+KyCUi5/bvPHqjOfoNO1sLltTNlwofqndxXFWPw6bBvN3Xsv5v/s0j2n63IpOJ f4bcwqsCAZ7DB9v39OOJt4B/pKcc7QjQzg8rQNabYB+ySF6X6z6h/kAx9nnLTSXJWX FMhWburEUbWNHLuSND6uW1FzXwx8YVD/zW71mnDlyG+NG2UtbSx2kA6F1vVnzjtai2 Is4FX0SqQRl2L/8mSxU/NqmW8as34y0wlJr+mnNCm5CRY6hSC+LNKP4+4pl0ca1V/g Xr9zv2ssG16h1P9PLmAnNJ40Rk6NVbmNLdrAsTW9hd09/vebbkX5IViVlfT7yJc86c JTVk98HQhjuuw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7859345E2B; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:34:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: SeongJae Park Cc: SeongJae Park , Federico Vaga , Carlos Bilbao , Avadhut Naik , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Docs: Move magic-number from process to staging In-Reply-To: <20240624185312.94537-4-sj@kernel.org> References: <20240624185312.94537-1-sj@kernel.org> <20240624185312.94537-4-sj@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:34:41 -0600 Message-ID: <878qyrz62m.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain SeongJae Park writes: > 'Other material' section on 'process/index' is for unsorted documents. > However we also have a dedicated place for the purpose, 'staging/'. > Move 'magic-number' from the section to 'staging/' directory. > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park > --- > Documentation/process/index.rst | 1 - > Documentation/staging/index.rst | 1 + > Documentation/{process => staging}/magic-number.rst | 0 > Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/magic-number.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/translations/sp_SP/process/magic-number.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/magic-number.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/translations/zh_TW/process/magic-number.rst | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > rename Documentation/{process => staging}/magic-number.rst (100%) I'll apply this for now, but I really think that this file, which has little to say about Git-era kernels, should just be removed. Thanks, jon