From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E575F22ACEF for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2025 23:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763249432; cv=none; b=uffB6H2adFKKJE+Wgpc/mYozkmggONQBOUmnAdeHPCRA33cBQzjAz48VlrfBAETuC0EcBIKTMSnX6d6Bnw84S2ePZhM0lO0hhDk6Mk8EIVj3VZYprp13PZojKwkQXj1u9ogIPCWAomLDeQBA6ZJiYvLOnBGMJz+sNQRbNwSfI1Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763249432; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aeaSB8wDx6Plj35K6ZGC2e2tnQNdri4T9y8baRoHtKQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TCtETLw6thlMIbJms95is3xs9N7JkVXgtwC7JJQ49IueczK6MQdjJqHuxLfn8ZH5FnVev7Qi3aj2QcbX1vU99EyubSVoAxG+dXa+BhzVbB8DQQQhOaS2oi2glkvmfx2S9gGmxYARCpFAXWyn+YmUtjnIVSlwFz2XWEaLvKSML9E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=oIJrzGvY; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=tYkJcOFl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="oIJrzGvY"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="tYkJcOFl" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1763249428; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bq4muiyIALgF02RyQ5JTyueNWXz7U4Aq8MTd9a86kx8=; b=oIJrzGvY8iKZpQB49Epj39H++mPjlidJA17oFwCXeYScw6Mm4AOUw0qTfRQXydXlnZ0KUa KveQzXojoN4sahCD9oDUYByCj39Z/vjWuJyawOUQkIENkK+Jo3rgUvdjTH+Q3jLDndHvVO LcQzEJz4d4uSy8cqZ0Imt8sQJG5rVilxEQMaaRxhD/VMK2cRj5haXsc1drlfXJrFypUc5q bVyRaJC1ob//gmrK78fEYAmN1pZ/JvZS5qgt/ukChOMbOaQWPIgCr7yq/p1bWGIJ4uOALw pwJtrT+DglBIICmXjZ51Bq5+P/a8iDjv9153OFvzDVNyjUvLe25ziqMthXp4rw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1763249428; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bq4muiyIALgF02RyQ5JTyueNWXz7U4Aq8MTd9a86kx8=; b=tYkJcOFlHMCIOovC1bB/S4ZAbo9C0ht+rvLexru5uxwowCVxHsl968YeqUlxEEUGeji44e Mx3wP1IogUxKMgCw== To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Dave Hansen , dave@sr71.net, Shuah Khan , Kees Cook , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Miguel Ojeda , NeilBrown , Lorenzo Stoakes , Dan Williams , Theodore Ts'o , Sasha Levin , Jonathan Corbet , Vlastimil Babka , workflows@vger.kernel.org, ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v3] Documentation: Provide guidelines for tool-generated content In-Reply-To: <20251115140746.6a3acfd5@batman.local.home> References: <20251114183528.1239900-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> <87qztz9v88.ffs@tglx> <20251115140556.44aac254@batman.local.home> <20251115140746.6a3acfd5@batman.local.home> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 00:30:27 +0100 Message-ID: <877bvqan70.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, Nov 15 2025 at 14:07, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 14:05:56 -0500 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> As Dave responded to Luis, although that is a good idea, it's out of >> scope for this document (for now). > > I should have said it's out of scope for this patch, not document. The > point is that what tag to use for this is a separate discussion. Which should be held in the context of this patch to make it complete. Thanks, tglx