From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1152C388F3 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 05:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EC320842 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 05:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=axtens.net header.i=@axtens.net header.b="lK6HNYOC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726157AbfJAFEa (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 01:04:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f176.google.com ([209.85.210.176]:42172 "EHLO mail-pf1-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725535AbfJAFEa (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 01:04:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f176.google.com with SMTP id q12so7044699pff.9 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:04:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axtens.net; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=4l0dg0M8NjqkocSKeh++ANmBguEcE58tWTQaoE7GXAA=; b=lK6HNYOCaOgoucqLoLhKrh1CYJvLV6sRy414x++r2dZBqeiCRixLZPMLyyDiAFyG54 Hg2QmoPyGvJMGVYs4VTzRCR59JBrcGLEVHIWgIXdZVHdcHV0+a0y/SWmJcr98WCueuAw C2htoELXNJ6683bXQAT3J/3pBzuPBp/W9o/ys= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=4l0dg0M8NjqkocSKeh++ANmBguEcE58tWTQaoE7GXAA=; b=rx3KOfwis8BsMQttgMXnv+Bzaw/h2KRPTutE1geij3PKta8FZChuQ40RH7H1xWGkk+ YJdaCoJLdItLi0av0z1zzdYWvr/9IyDX+R0TAXJDKDU39nbCJlW3wecb45ysNWDktS+e gx+ATgxYXNn/jOhwroHVFY27E2q2M65tNlKLK1vWS4+K59hGyndpbSQomcL7QhveDGkF OKiexsFpt01MTmK4vnf2zseLzIc8kareRHPasLPDoG+88Qm2HgD6Sxvjgg14bFXe7Bbo NM0xIr5ItmPGY/qsGq+qv7c298nZPrSqSGk11kYPxeQHxoVPtCdXD2WWNmB/L8giz3nP gqCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWWz6nXUkzBiGafv0Z6ieRiqiZeMlJ2Ean77gwVlTwoDqKxu1O8 LiHGjQ5fA75v+YwcJ24jO+VcHg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoeAcNasq8WS7MghBHGv2FfuA2FT7BzJihh8voxfxGXHeAoFaK8hNk7hmjya0XPjOB+Z7gxA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8492:: with SMTP id u18mr943132pfn.247.1569906267931; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ppp167-251-205.static.internode.on.net. [59.167.251.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v19sm15016806pff.46.2019.09.30.22.04.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:04:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Axtens To: Andrew Donnellan , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , workflows@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bjorn Helgaas , Jiri Kosina , Konstantin Ryabitsev Subject: Re: Kernel development collaboration platform wish list In-Reply-To: <522b803e-027e-e809-5dfa-826861344bd1@linux.ibm.com> References: <1811089.yxvLMk49Ug@kreacher> <5072394.GngetUhsyG@kreacher> <87blv13yxc.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> <522b803e-027e-e809-5dfa-826861344bd1@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:04:14 +1000 Message-ID: <875zl93vld.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: workflows-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org Andrew Donnellan writes: > On 1/10/19 5:52 am, Daniel Axtens wrote: >>> (d) Support for "maintainer views" >>> >>> That is, by default subsystem maintainers should see patches, bug reports >>> etc against the code maintained by them, with the possibility to extend the >>> view to also see the other submissions. >>> >>> [That kind of is the case in Patchwork today when patches sent to different >>> mailing lists show up under different "projects", but the problem in there >>> is that copies of one patch appear under multiple "projects" as different >>> entities if sent to multiple lists.] >> >> /me puts on pw maintainer hat >> >> This is true, they are each individual database entries. This is largely >> because projects will often change the state of patches differently. (An >> example is a patch sent to multiple lists to collect ACKs before being >> merged.) > > We really should get around to adding inter-project links for matching > message-IDs. Sure, we just have to get the UI right so that people aren't overwhelmed in the case where a patch is sent to a dozen different lists. Regards, Daniel > > -- > Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra > ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited