From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B64D346FCF; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768946253; cv=none; b=HMiKP7E6sZWfydDTomzERmr2HhCcRgFRTUmdVtxqBJmMLtzs1CtKXAWhMNZu77q/mb3rrFvoj/I3Wi+n3qfQQZTiUaTQJ2N6LDzNbWXUiQQXKCX98DGDYJHpBDcsigfYUDCk3u78CYIBVkuITFvSai1pLcalcDoPiwn1fYM/RM0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768946253; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GR/T74euQZ+vr4mwmrV5h6gP3Xs0x1K8urT5OcaMFQo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GoY72bBEWxotBjiQ7LJqtEgXOI78poaMDP8JQL2GwV69xCIF+qa2W6a+bZvh4OVYpX5a996fY1IqGqgo74H7Wawaf9PdAnxySU8+u5mSZuS1ex3+tvxNmUfNimP/x1n6fIEsDQjZJSRv3jqfW4RSr094EkmydVESDdLSXPXJRCs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=sxVyrEkr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="sxVyrEkr" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 14B2C40C27 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1768946250; bh=GR/T74euQZ+vr4mwmrV5h6gP3Xs0x1K8urT5OcaMFQo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=sxVyrEkr6UQmVx20j5g0kauYrLHlnRB8CdcrZYnv0sOS/drDc5+35mNbXR0eDZ/oG 43GtdIrSQZQhERJ8DVtdCtDLGVsUXR8QPVjjUVQyv3aS6+yuTBDPD/xyVBnK4FkZlS Hob+UFjKu8yjzH8RTqQ0xAHe2mteicqy5ne2EkYWwdbS8qhp2n8ONOcDHTbVP7oWL2 uhGeBMZNZ9pPWsbOV3ObZ1l/oqySlOyd+lQwNgttsjI/yuk8+aXzBLYcNA6gh+/7Pd gfEb/c70kvV5RqoparsLIrkez2IutMM8dcAYtnbL7BVRMu6pMsGD05gXHeLGt38Lt4 cgYFB1tUm5NRQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14B2C40C27; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:57:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Thompson , junan Cc: jason.wessel@windriver.com, dianders@chromium.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: kgdb: Add description about rodata=off kernel parameter In-Reply-To: <87tswhlkkz.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> References: <20260116050410.772340-2-junan76@163.com> <87tswhlkkz.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:57:29 -0700 Message-ID: <875x8whrqu.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jonathan Corbet writes: > Daniel Thompson writes: > >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 01:03:13PM +0800, junan wrote: >>> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX can not be turned off throught menuconfig on some >>> architectures, pass "rodata=off" to the kernel in this case. >>> >>> Tested with qemu on arm64. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: junan >>> Suggested-by: Will Deacon >> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson (RISCstar) >> >> Jonathan: do you want to take this or should I take it via the kgdb >> tree? > > I'm fine either way; I'll pick it up shortly unless you say you've > already done so. ...and I have just done that, thanks. jon