From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7CF245021; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739471968; cv=none; b=AlGFU/2s+EhnkSElmVC4jSdj/6K6l7mlKpuXqvPFIb0oSz1XYvVI6Qamzj86umwV3MfSupj2uXUNFYQyi04ZHGvxb4dwobBNaNjOiJwGDhC//ydhnTrZIgWm3pEnpOKLZfdlgLFfcuiSOcFh8uLzel0sFfaFUhqGc6jeszs1SBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739471968; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IL4JfZ8f/GmNV2oysYaN+vVvAghC4NR4d9vaXPutmxU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PIywRpEMbJRzitcKTQkZiSAKq5tQoUvUGDKzIOGUXxrCN9llrNsOwbZeKKQwJerNPObA/OO0goxxFxEQTXjDvBODfxj/b9I+DhhqqBprGfZyqnWnWfWAkm0984ngLg62WH97iXq4KzgiUfectLFSBEOy3A+QQnLvHviEbjZ7Z4c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=Kztbnl7b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="Kztbnl7b" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2E41640411 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1739471966; bh=hWkxJ1YfLob73I7zxkcyS5NjQGuT1JLfL25ucCp224w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Kztbnl7bnXKKL9nmBXC8dduAeQpXAai0HXznNTtO0ezpnwdepmRaJTQNzAwyAG9Io UrPsV+FC/qluP3qW4UNtBd+sANT3CRFpjkgGYu2qpm53RY/Q2BoTQf68/CyHt8yRMB sUJWB2GJPb4RD/GwTPyxKlbk8OsehSmf+goCfe6ynqwY1rH6nKLy9BwubgH7dxfmx2 Wg98MTfummjoZlzmoL+4OsjHeMkKOFKr2hE2z74llUpgCsITq6IKcTBT4VOjCu4Bdz XEbK8PFV/BTYVvFlmFKh9bqMO1WQdSdS00rFHrAyAeiLQMigmx9PGg3VKOSlZ9nNP0 TnZWQ1aRMp7mw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E41640411; Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:39:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Nick Desaulniers , bpf@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, workflows@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Raise the bar with regards to Python and Sphinx requirements In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:39:25 -0700 Message-ID: <871pw14rky.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > This series increases the minimal requirements for Sphinx and Python, and > drop some backward-compatible code from Sphinx extension. OK, I've gone ahead and applied this series - let's see who screams... Thanks, jon