Re: [RFC v2] MAINTAINERS: split kselftest entry into 'framework' and 'all'

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 11/15/24 13:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> The testing effort is increasing throughout the community.
> The tests are generally merged into the subsystem trees,
> and are of relatively narrow interest. The patch volume on
> linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org makes it hard to follow
> the changes to the framework, and discuss proposals.
> 
> Create a new ML focused on the framework of kselftests,
> which will hopefully be similarly low volume to the workflows@
> mailing list.
> 
>  From the responses to v1 I gather that the preference is to
> keep the existing list for all (or create an alias to it);
> the framework-only section should be the one to have a new
> list created.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive
> but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very
> least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer.
> 
> Posting as an RFC because we need to create the new ML.
I have to repeat the same thing I said when you sent RFC v1
It is going to add the confusion - people don't cc the one mailing list
we have now.

I am going to have to say no. Sorry.

thanks,
-- Shuah