workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	<workflows@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Is there an integrated b4 + patchwork guide for maintainers?
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:22:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <68c375e619355_75db10018@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <972dd368-282a-4255-9b88-6324c1924512@oss.qualcomm.com>

Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 7/17/2024 12:30 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > I'm in the process of taking over ath.git maintainer activities from Kalle. He
> > has shared his workflow, but much of it is based upon using Stacked Git (STG)
> > and a patchwork script he authored. I seems like many (most?) maintainers are
> > now using b4, and Kalle fully supports me using it, so I just want to see if
> > there is a guide or sample workflow for using b4 along with patchwork. I'd
> > like to adopt a proven workflow rather than stumbling around on my own.
> 
> I sent this over a year ago (using my former credentials). I did not receive
> any responses at that time, so I just cobbled things together.
> 
> In light of current discussion about using Link: tags, and related discussion
> about how multi-commit series should be treated (applied linearly or merged
> from a dev branch), it seems timely to re-ask the question. Is there a guide
> or recommended sample workflow for using b4 along with patchwork?

I am not aware of one. I have maintained the CXL subsystem with
patchwork and b4 in the past, but did not use much more than:

https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/index.html

...in terms of a guide.

b4 mostly does some patchwork flows better, like pulling patches from
the list, and patchwork-bot handles the thank-yous and marking patches
accepted with their commit-ids.

Outside of that it quickly gets into subsystem specific flows around
patch states, delegation, and submitter expectations.

I would recommend going through the subsystem handbooks if you have not
already in terms inspiration for setting submitter expectations:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.16-rc1/process/maintainer-handbooks.html

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-12  1:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-17 19:30 Jeff Johnson
2025-09-11 23:54 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-09-12  1:22   ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-09-14 12:44   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=68c375e619355_75db10018@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox