workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	workflows@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel development collaboration platform wish list
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:40:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575CE8BF-4C3A-4AEB-8749-9D2B92FCD4D3@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX31h-VEf0bCjdTTLSO8xwMdE1cR9GsQ2tEk4PSHOPctA@mail.gmail.com>

That would be wonderful.

-- Steve

On September 26, 2019 12:18:18 PM GMT+02:00, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:19 PM Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>> One of the things I'd like to add as a strong desire is the ability
>to
>> review patches via web if that's what users would like to do.  There
>> are some real benefits for web-based review.  It means that if you
>> need to see greater context, it's relatively easy to do this.  It
>also
>> is convenient to be able to see the conversation for a particular
>hunk
>> of code right alongside the code.
>>
>> It's clear that whatever we do, it needs to be compatible with
>e-mail.
>> That's very clear.  But it would be useful if we can support both the
>> e-mail and web-based review.  There have some prototypes that have
>> been floated which shows that it is at least possible; perhaps
>> imperfectly, but something which provides a bidrectional gateway
>> between those who perfer to use e-mail and those that prefer to use a
>> web-based UI would be able to do it.
>>
>> There will be many potential kernel contributors who will be used to
>> web-based UI's such as those that are available on github.  So while
>> remaining e-mail compatible, having some way of allow as many
>> operations to be done via web interfaces might help us get some newer
>> developers who are more comfortable to living on the web than some of
>> us more senior developers who remember when "gopher" was a text-based
>> search engine, and not a mascot for the Go programming langauge.  :-)
>
>And if it's done right, it may solve (or make it harder to show) other
>bad review
>behavior, like:
>  - Top posting review comments,
>- Quoting a 2000-line patch when commenting on a single line deep down.
>
>Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                        Geert

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity and top posting.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-26 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13  8:22 Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-09-13 11:13 ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-17 21:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-09-18  8:05     ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-18 13:43       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-13 11:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-13 12:02   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-09-13 12:15     ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-13 12:23       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-09-17 22:00         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-02  9:30   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-09-17 18:40 ` Stefan Schmidt
2019-09-24  9:43   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-09-24 12:20     ` Stefan Schmidt
2019-09-17 22:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-01  3:52   ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-01  4:50     ` Andrew Donnellan
2019-10-01  5:04       ` Daniel Axtens
2019-09-23 16:20 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-09-24  1:39   ` Eric Wong
2019-09-24  5:06     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-01  3:58     ` Daniel Axtens
2019-09-26 10:18   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-09-26 11:40     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-09-26 13:39       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-09-28 22:16         ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-29 16:03           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-09-26 13:10     ` Jani Nikula
2019-09-26 13:41       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-09-26 14:40         ` Jani Nikula
2019-10-02  9:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-02 14:22     ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-03  9:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575CE8BF-4C3A-4AEB-8749-9D2B92FCD4D3@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox