From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B833E8C7C; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.134.164.83 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773128359; cv=none; b=S6MSxu+YtzvUhHuXaEf9SxIyKOSj5KxyxydaGP0wEPsRqGyogYeVFhF4S9R8dRp74tQDN+uj8X+RAmZGM+MwR5X3Dn45M3fWt694fA1TQpUzZulm/hK1rLqWWrziwx0nujsut3ViPWtK1+OF91EN+Tblr7W8r+ZWZcjr94nL+ZM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773128359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EG1SahnCbxi3XzK3bLDGK2sA5TJc1m500q7G0hL3bFA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fc97sLIqdnvZOOKmt0wZ7UJbQkomSiKEA7L6cxHOB9xPKcFXT+SSDp7t2gWnAqzu8stxRpOtZ3kL2rRNaucFr2wjN24WC3+huIkPoglwoPgH6bFcC9GVob9bwAOZh/zrzzNRzM3Din8C0Mo34jC7QTVInIy9dnQ40ZqcwcHvgTI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inria.fr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=inria.fr header.i=@inria.fr header.b=VkBuHLt5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.134.164.83 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inria.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=inria.fr header.i=@inria.fr header.b="VkBuHLt5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=4mfDL0FzHrPi+ovP2EoBEIFIrlJiuL7mmRGIUBNqTUE=; b=VkBuHLt5XWdWfc+4wiCOcJHVkC+zON+2D7w0ns+DrDlpUxwtkXtLurad QDVfpbPRh9TOPmlvPUuZl7FlkCQBGrEjIRYSeYhzkMdSZ25q3hiGX5akJ RpXCueLnvIFgxJjwpo5VZEgL7oHYZ/ABfvQaUcSBre9JS554879X5dIbz g=; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: B5Dhr2BaRGmtitjvQW+Vsw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qw+9Q1VzToKCiY4/rmZcBg== Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=julia.lawall@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,111,1770591600"; d="scan'208";a="267009203" Received: from dt-lawall.paris.inria.fr ([128.93.67.65]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2026 08:39:12 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:39:12 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall To: Nicolas Palix cc: Haoyang Liu , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , cocci@inria.fr, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/dev-tools: fix a broken URL in dev-tools/coccinelle.rst In-Reply-To: <1c546ad7-14f8-4695-9754-32a020f8a082@imag.fr> Message-ID: <4c157be7-7673-c513-65f0-f0222cf8d117@inria.fr> References: <20260308100851.341-1-tttturtleruss@gmail.com> <87v7f5vv9x.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <1c546ad7-14f8-4695-9754-32a020f8a082@imag.fr> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-918604625-1773128352=:23815" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-918604625-1773128352=:23815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, Nicolas Palix wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe we can just throw away that section of "Supplemental documentation" and > its link ? > > Nowadays, there is much more SmPL provided, and the rst file > describes better and up-to-date information. > > Would a link to > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/coccinelle.html > be useful to point to latest version ? OK, thanks. There is also an out of date URL in that page. I will send a patch. julia > > Sincerely, > > Le 09/03/2026 à 17:28, Haoyang Liu a écrit : > > > > On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > LIU Haoyang writes: > > > > > > > The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is > > > > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not > > > > found page, > > > > thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, > > > > which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang > > > > --- > > > >   Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- > > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/ > > > > dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation > > > >   For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: > > > > -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > > > > +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html > > > >   The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the > > > > script. > > > I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one.  But is > > > there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE > > > CONTENT" at the top? > > > > Dear Jon, > > > > Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I > > have to use it even though it's obsolete. > > > > Sincerely, > > Haoyang > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > jon > > > > > > > > > > --8323329-918604625-1773128352=:23815--