From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="LaRJBd/V" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4345CB2 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 08:46:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701881196; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ztLXRobUGlRg7eZ1W79vYwaD7gzoNeRhSy97eRCnmUA=; b=LaRJBd/V1FK0mOTgpHQdGbGB1If76u2ir2r7YalIGIx89/qArTEgsH3JXjK/bO2kbcx1b7 ce5xEls1pzGhKpuICrOz0KNte3BYcMwaPEkBv7b4FoaMUr8ry5gnR6f7RxLnN3zSRWst2Y Kwu3XjDKd8xdp4DnTWeOHwukbcHj7CM= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-563-sXu3hh7ZNNqJCHU4mS25cQ-1; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 11:46:34 -0500 X-MC-Unique: sXu3hh7ZNNqJCHU4mS25cQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40c25973861so2169125e9.2 for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:46:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701881192; x=1702485992; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ztLXRobUGlRg7eZ1W79vYwaD7gzoNeRhSy97eRCnmUA=; b=n9N1CX8mom3xaLcTJLi8OglKAb2CETav6MIAaKr9F3ilEjNXWfnFtXGX+/ghAGdXtt LCqQK+u0RQFgEfB++xnYuQiuSnJtdaOORSge/yOtihHz/bS4aH6pBrYNQCmXHiyNx068 mm7FkriXiKrBDUJRzOXR5gDBCUnI510nOajWF2vyTiCEwHU7eTT7IvNCF2gf55jqQfwA cBFluKbkELwk5cLikNdm1NkQRtDGnrnms8/aE31vrK42HV/K0DYE+5FomxLH5LgXkTGI IGcZau7+GHuPcjkGnXCAvKwwJfLVtm/ZhZ5AH1Qor5vi5p0jhY9SvsCfkVSdFEO0116N hZ+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz1xo29p5JYFDGgLUHodUTgXvBmEQ7NrPcDvoi0h21Bjoul6gm/ gz+7LV5kBr5kxlGPi3wCFEadnB/IyH4KOV5TUvMLoEtcSHS1zY6j1v/YFsc3voWmrhNDEyNWmPo Vg5l8iuiffnJh7+BDQNbQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1713:b0:40c:25be:8a99 with SMTP id c19-20020a05600c171300b0040c25be8a99mr209614wmn.180.1701881192144; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:46:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6+sJCQ7NPS9J3bWUaCeQ035R0YndFZiH1h1M8dTENxMmIOZL3Iu6YxOH5ePuLcu7bSBwMbw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1713:b0:40c:25be:8a99 with SMTP id c19-20020a05600c171300b0040c25be8a99mr209612wmn.180.1701881191880; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.118] (88-113-27-52.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [88.113.27.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az40-20020a05600c602800b004064cd71aa8sm131226wmb.34.2023.12.06.08.46.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Dec 2023 08:46:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4a5d9c6e-186b-4681-88a6-63c50576adea@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:46:29 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] docs: submitting-patches: Introduce Tested-with: Content-Language: en-US To: Joe Perches , Jonathan Corbet , workflows@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Theodore Ts'o , David Gow , Steven Rostedt , Mark Brown , Shuah Khan , "Darrick J . Wong" Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Veronika Kabatova , CKI , kernelci@lists.linux.dev References: <20231115175146.9848-1-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> <20231205184503.79769-1-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> <20231205184503.79769-5-Nikolai.Kondrashov@redhat.com> <87zfyomq5k.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Nikolai Kondrashov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/5/23 21:07, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 11:59 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Nikolai Kondrashov writes: >> >>> Introduce a new tag, 'Tested-with:', documented in the >>> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst file. > [] >> I have to ask whether we *really* need to introduce yet another tag for >> this. How are we going to use this information? Are we going to try to >> make a tag for every way in which somebody might test a patch? > > In general, I think > Link: > would be good enough. > > And remember that all this goes stale after awhile > and that includes old test suites. Yeah, things go stale, for sure. And Link: will work for specifying the test results (provided the contents says what the test was), but it doesn't help maintainers to know immediately which tests were executed and which weren't. It also won't allow involving checkpatch.pl in checking the submitter ran all the required tests, and telling them to run whatever they didn't. Nick