Re: [PATCH v2] docs: maintainer: Fix ambiguous subheading formatting

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 9/16/25 3:29 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Add a newline after both subheadings to avoid any ambiguous formatting,
> especially in htmldocs. Without the newline, subheadings are rendered as
> part of the following paragraphs, which can be confusing to read.
> 
> Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix subheading formatting with newlines as suggested by Randy
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250915192235.2414746-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev/
> ---
>  Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> index cda5d691e967..d36dd892a78a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ week) that patches might be considered for merging and when patches need to
>  wait for the next -rc. At a minimum:
>  
>  - Last -rc for new feature submissions:
> +
>    New feature submissions targeting the next merge window should have
>    their first posting for consideration before this point. Patches that
>    are submitted after this point should be clear that they are targeting
> @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ wait for the next -rc. At a minimum:
>    submissions should appear before -rc5.
>  
>  - Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions
> +
>    Indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch
>    set will need to wait for the NEXT+1 merge window. Of course there is no
>    obligation to ever accept any given patchset, but if the review has not

-- 
~Randy