From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@gtucker.io>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
"Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] scripts: introduce containerized builds
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:49:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260119214931.GA1058062@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119213516.GA1051134@ax162>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 02:35:16PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> I will apply this to kbuild-next-unstable shortly to give folks a week
> or so to voice any objections or give critical review comments.
During application, checkpatch.pl pointed out that this should have a
MAINTAINERS entry. Would you be opposed to the following?
CONTAINER BUILD SCRIPT
M: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@gtucker.io>
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/dev-tools/container.rst
F: scripts/container
I will also add scripts/container to the kbuild entry. Now that I am
looking, it looks like Nicolas has been left out of this whole thread,
cc'ing him now (even though I assume he should have seen this through
linux-kbuild but just in case not, the top of the thread is
https://lore.kernel.org/cover.1767199119.git.gtucker@gtucker.io/).
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-31 16:51 Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-31 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] scripts: add tool to run " Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-31 16:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: add container.rst page Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-20 13:53 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-01-20 18:35 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-20 18:39 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-21 9:55 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-22 4:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-22 14:25 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-22 10:13 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-16 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] scripts: introduce containerized builds Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-16 21:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-19 14:22 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-19 21:35 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-19 21:49 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-01-20 9:56 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-20 17:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-20 9:46 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-20 17:55 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-20 13:54 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-01-20 18:04 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-21 10:13 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-22 14:12 ` Guillaume Tucker
2026-01-27 20:13 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-01-31 13:36 ` Guillaume Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260119214931.GA1058062@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=gtucker@gtucker.io \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox