From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F4A2BE647; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 01:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768354496; cv=none; b=u8ccdbLRdbDDkVaPw6Xo/o0UFjsExWToCL8ca0SPBhs7Pzkiv3ayG1K7PP0yTlq82i50DapOuB68CZbzhoJoJLaHX5Qle9sUjkf7GMSN2ANHZAqbadiTV7J5mJeKa4F+465LOIFP8lMy6DsebZvAGkQodIwYfTGZXPKBVcofQNQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768354496; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XkMgpfEJT768LmocN+/6PFDvzRNBErn+j+xO5bWs1q8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TqGizdB+UbI6qpJgdej+GTF8c1W1X/8gqowypiv5WgEStRDZVckjXXASBcRpjZXBQn5McUbEKQ+j8VGTF24Et5APgyMYqMH6oennXDj/92bTI15ZR5lua2BXQ10HAJr9cUPVa38XcF/Y4K/3fpcdxuwR69xHBzaikA0l8VzIJI8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pCLHM8vU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pCLHM8vU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF58FC116C6; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 01:34:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768354496; bh=XkMgpfEJT768LmocN+/6PFDvzRNBErn+j+xO5bWs1q8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pCLHM8vU4qNfLeJM0L6K1mibE56Ydf7eWbKlFb4BfCxIBnXV4WacDdGHY80CPqlF6 P3FsjZDIGyYl9aUiQDW33nEbBqdK3PDWlFuolwlsuDGJhwNc5uCqJVMX8C85f2sz5V h6twdwf0DgyrsvvUbtUgg2T2KCUccpiHjqxrowcBM8/Fe2C9UYb1uwstMZ4AnKgmJQ 5pL/EH1eDK1t1p2qbF+HwY48NtB9YjnS1LC1SchD07SLU4wCWt0d2p9qkLr0or0BY/ NxKcqxlqtkllijioClr7pmFE+SnO0i/lQ6n7KOyRcNpmD1VrTySYFu64O4hsWOkbHa Ayd4Rl3OYa+Dw== Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:34:54 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Simon Horman Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jonathan Corbet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: netdev: refine 15-patch limit Message-ID: <20260113173454.55a995cc@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260113-15-minutes-of-fame-v1-1-0806b418c6fd@kernel.org> References: <20260113-15-minutes-of-fame-v1-1-0806b418c6fd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:47:15 +0000 Simon Horman wrote: > +Limit patches outstanding on mailing list > +----------------------------------------- > + > +Avoid having more than 15 patches, across all series, outstanding for > +review on the mailing list. This limit is intended to focus developer > +effort on testing patches before upstream review. Aiding the quality of > +upstream submissions, and easing the load on reviewers. Thanks for adding this. In practice I think the limit is also per tree (net vs net-next) to avoid head of line blocking fixes.