From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
konstantin@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, joe@perches.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] README: restructure with role-based documentation and guidelines
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:49:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511180848.8A660DDB@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wm3n47u6.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 09:35:29AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> That said, I have one quibble :)
>
> > +Examples of Proper Attribution:
> > +
> > +Good examples:
> > + Assisted-by: AI-Tool:model-version-1.0 coccinelle
> > + Assisted-by: AI-Assistant:v2.5.0
> > + Assisted-by: Code-Helper:model-2024-04-09 sparse smatch
> > + Assisted-by: ML-Agent:version-2024-11
> > +
> > +Bad examples (DO NOT USE):
> > + Assisted-by: AI # Too vague
> > + Assisted-by: AI-Tool coccinelle git # Don't list basic tools
> > + Signed-off-by: AI Assistant <ai@...> # NEVER - AI cannot sign off
>
> I don't think this belongs here - we don't have examples of good SOB
> lines - or of anything else. What this needs, instead, is a link to
> Dave's tools document once that goes in.
>
> (We also, in truth, do not yet have a consensus on what the attribution
> tags should be, and here isn't the place to try to form one.)
Agreed -- I love the new sections, but we need to drop the Assisted-by
portion until we've had the in-person discussions at Maintainers/LPC.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 21:38 Sasha Levin
2025-11-18 1:11 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-11-18 2:24 ` Sasha Levin
2025-11-18 8:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-11-18 16:35 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-11-18 16:49 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-11-18 16:52 ` Sasha Levin
2025-11-18 17:42 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511180848.8A660DDB@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox