From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] docs: maintainer: Fix ambiguous subheading formatting
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:29:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916222944.2547948-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> (raw)
Add a newline after both subheadings to avoid any ambiguous formatting,
especially in htmldocs. Without the newline, subheadings are rendered as
part of the following paragraphs, which can be confusing to read.
Suggested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
Changes in v2:
- Fix subheading formatting with newlines as suggested by Randy
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250915192235.2414746-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev/
---
Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
index cda5d691e967..d36dd892a78a 100644
--- a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
+++ b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ week) that patches might be considered for merging and when patches need to
wait for the next -rc. At a minimum:
- Last -rc for new feature submissions:
+
New feature submissions targeting the next merge window should have
their first posting for consideration before this point. Patches that
are submitted after this point should be clear that they are targeting
@@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ wait for the next -rc. At a minimum:
submissions should appear before -rc5.
- Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions
+
Indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch
set will need to wait for the NEXT+1 merge window. Of course there is no
obligation to ever accept any given patchset, but if the review has not
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 22:29 Thorsten Blum [this message]
2025-09-16 23:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-09-17 10:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-18 16:28 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916222944.2547948-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--to=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox