From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E459014AD20; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 22:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754345666; cv=none; b=T7upzSMbEUd0TgRVW97qjxFT09MiRz2iNtXo2GM0hATphm0MK9slI4k7CWtMalkQ4fqpEZu4a5OidbMgrhWF3pfi4/em1glNREWvUCbPoqmRM7IpLsi/ljVd1LZDepqz2gBZzmKOR+Qr8C2Z/gCPMAc6q21OaxvqRAUIO18fBJ4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754345666; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pFbnUxGl0sPENav/GjAMaSL10vuA8xzn7uiyMHniyW0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sPQP5pqAzdS4dv8wa105ar1S8uJMS3O6leTYCpbURHyymGx7QALlFlT8u5Onu2dKpL/ZRlSqEwWQsH4hwXouAIrK42f18cs6ElxCb9lw5s8KvHcch30OHAuXtrwEMtZ6bfX5dzgn4rYRArC1YifwI72/JkIu3nbpbP594H43/sw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf18.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08E1115A44; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 22:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4DB632F; Mon, 4 Aug 2025 22:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 18:14:47 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Sasha Levin , Michal Hocko , David Hildenbrand , Greg KH , Vlastimil Babka , corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, kees@kernel.org, konstantin@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add agent coding assistant configuration to Linux kernel Message-ID: <20250804181447.0c518b14@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20250727195802.2222764-1-sashal@kernel.org> <75d86e96-cb18-4996-998c-da7ac0e97468@suse.cz> <9afd157a-296d-4f4d-9d65-07b89ab3906f@redhat.com> <2025072832-enrich-pampers-54b9@gregkh> <1bd04ce1-87c0-4e23-b155-84f7235f6072@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DB632F X-Stat-Signature: 1hz9xr1y1u4hbk67z9uwtg71uuu5ga5m X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout06 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+E+wlnvIcd+hUCrbJeRFIBLjjjBhto9Bg= X-HE-Tag: 1754345659-681559 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX18YLrxLOUkgjEfopPIdEJvv5mN/WnXnXi2698t+Z9iw7lw9P7RfYOXup5q61vC8AuwXqCP5z6DOr/0gxHsXYrFE6H341O9++kbf2D4rHks6cEYfwSHrPxEfn5Qio8yHeTwsBZe5wKiEpPc8Pj1LV3kEki76UaqATIB6YhH985G1osdDxGijQRahZNKgSGhR6hEa7GsX+0WxmpxIdfclwkmPsxpNMDSNJQgRwSPPFnXJfiI75D1PS91p+Dr1pwBkdrD65NdcYokVmyZGy5eNgSWsf87OY1VkeNGMfmvDF4PHfkGzUGKUXDR4G66r+vFvQhfowpLED9jSBBK++BM0IXLv On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 00:03:29 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina wrote: > Al made a very important point somewhere earlier in this thread. > > The most important (from the code quality POV) thing is -- is there a > person that understands the patch enough to be able to answer questions > (coming from some other human -- most likely reviewer/maintainer)? > > That's not something that'd be reflected in DCO, but it's very important > fact for the maintainer's decision process. Perhaps this is what needs to be explicitly stated in the SubmittingPatches document. I know we can't change the DCO, but could we add something about our policy is that if you submit code, you certify that you understand said code, even if (especially) it was produced by AI? -- Steve