From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679CF22B8C5; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 23:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753401252; cv=none; b=qr6O6B4lSlGmvaXKJ5+C4AtSl8QKkRLAFE/Zob0VHfDOC0gfmGTUrUafP+O+QQWy50TCSU9atQRgrnZ0ImYSJoL2ujpzI2hQd4OdWY7rz+Wk1m+/CY6CkjnGYCH9RQ+8lpSUxnwS/KC+mzCKKkpB/OfdiWxkMgpO8WOVa8PiMeE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753401252; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q9jh7CkBbhldMF1J1smRrxzkFS3p/4ns7ni/1yXL+gQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t/8OBs8tZQCX3iZS7eDW7QYbGBMPLQPb5NkfJtqW/kqZhy8+S6tfIyxrE9VGZ0sEJWRWM/voUZ1IaTGbTOzJeQHQHLChRZDubo9XHBKkCNDIEbEj13dxflDV6z3tDg9ThJ6ZG6CpBBzYWylILh5hgziUjsOhT41tMvcSorZzTyA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VAp72SLD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VAp72SLD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A1ECC4CEED; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 23:54:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753401252; bh=Q9jh7CkBbhldMF1J1smRrxzkFS3p/4ns7ni/1yXL+gQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VAp72SLDWjoJQolLVXqmG89HQuXI4rOyYoT/r7/OmhpCUYd3IVuD/mPrCpYWwKkNF LEbV3b2QQhWgssePkS/zTeBB+ng03J+rOQGTOZpBxI8GxxFAR2+ChFaVstdP6Mb8Yn xv4OmBCg7EyZLF2/skP2LRXrcItJ5ABYURm7kRkMVBFg6f9v8s2XSEz6Xb6qcwCOb+ pR+eHV8HgqkUoJucQ/7EODEKIASEaxRqB0EbcLqC9yVjGy10BoXl6/oPZQpYkHmnuz 7WqMpSL88i8Sk29xWaqzC3ldqwH9xYcjAjglXQOMAQhUQaVMX8VlTvSqvDhbI60wuV Ncne9e7ef+GLA== Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:54:11 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Steven Rostedt Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Konstantin Ryabitsev , corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: (AI?) Tool disclosure tag Message-ID: <202507241651.5E9C803C70@keescook> References: <20250724175439.76962-1-linux@treblig.org> <20250724-alluring-fuzzy-tanuki-6e8282@lemur> <202507241337.F9595E1D@keescook> <202507241418.34AFD28C@keescook> <20250724194556.105803db@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250724194556.105803db@gandalf.local.home> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 07:45:56PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > My thought is to treat AI as another developer. If a developer helps you > like the AI is helping you, would you give that developer credit for that > work? If so, then you should also give credit to the tooling that's helping > you. > > I suggested adding a new tag to note any tool that has done non-trivial > work to produce the patch where you give it credit if it has helped you as > much as another developer that you would give credit to. We've got tags to choose from already in that case: Suggested-by: LLM or Co-developed-by: LLM Signed-off-by: LLM The latter seems ... not good, as it implies DCO SoB from a thing that can't and hasn't acknowledged the DCO. -- Kees Cook