workflows.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
To: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: "Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
	"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
	"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] kunit: tool: Don't overwrite test status based on subtest counts
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 14:55:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250704145203-1dbf1c70-5ce9-4654-9995-4b794a8ee96e@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250703170653-0747ad3a-ee33-4ce9-9f69-1118b0d8260a@linutronix.de>

Hi Rae,

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 05:11:59PM -0400, Rae Moar wrote:

<snip>

> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py                                  | 5 +++++
> > >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py                               | 3 ++-
> > >  tools/testing/kunit/test_data/test_is_test_passed-failure-nested.log | 3 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> > > index c176487356e6c94882046b19ea696d750905b8d5..2478beb28fc3db825855ad46200340e884da7df1 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
> > > @@ -686,6 +686,11 @@ def bubble_up_test_results(test: Test) -> None:
> > >                 counts.add_status(status)
> > >         elif test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
> > >                 test.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
> > > +       if not test.ok_status():
> > > +               for t in subtests:
> > > +                       if not t.ok_status():
> > > +                               counts.add_status(t.status)
> > > +                               break
> > 
> > Here instead I recommend checking if not test.ok_status() and
> > test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.SUCCESS and if so
> > counts.add_status(status)
> 
> Thanks for the recommendation. I tried this and it works well for this specific
> testcase, but unfortunately all kinds of othes tests are now broken.
> I'll look into it some more, but any hints are highly appreciated.
> It has been a while since I looked at the code.

The following variant passes all tests. What do you think?

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
index 333cd3a4a56b..5338489dcbe4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py
@@ -689,6 +689,9 @@ def bubble_up_test_results(test: Test) -> None:
        elif test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED:
                test.status = TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED
 
+       if status == TestStatus.FAILURE and test.counts.get_status() == TestStatus.SUCCESS:
+               counts.add_status(status)
+

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-04 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26  6:10 [PATCH v4 00/15] kunit: Introduce UAPI testing framework Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] kbuild: userprogs: avoid duplication of flags inherited from kernel Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-03 13:59   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-07-04 21:51   ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] kbuild: userprogs: also inherit byte order and ABI " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-03 14:00   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-07-04 21:51   ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] kbuild: doc: add label for userprogs section Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-03 14:00   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-07-04 21:55   ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] init: re-add CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-03 14:00   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-07-04 21:55   ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] init: add nolibc build support Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-03 14:01   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] fs,fork,exit: export symbols necessary for KUnit UAPI support Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] kunit: tool: Add test for nested test result reporting Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-01 21:26   ` Rae Moar
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] kunit: tool: Don't overwrite test status based on subtest counts Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-01 21:11   ` Rae Moar
2025-07-03 15:29     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-04 12:55       ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] kunit: tool: Parse skipped tests from kselftest.h Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-01 21:22   ` Rae Moar
2025-07-03 15:59     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] kunit: Always descend into kunit directory during build Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] kunit: qemu_configs: loongarch: Enable LSX/LSAX Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] kunit: Introduce UAPI testing framework Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26 18:11   ` Benjamin Berg
2025-06-27  4:20     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-27  6:58       ` Benjamin Berg
2025-06-27  8:27         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] kunit: uapi: Add example for UAPI tests Thomas Weißschuh
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] kunit: uapi: Introduce preinit executable Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-12  9:49   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2025-06-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] kunit: uapi: Validate usability of /proc Thomas Weißschuh
2025-07-07 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] kunit: Introduce UAPI testing framework Jonathan Corbet
2025-07-08  5:51   ` Thomas Weißschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250704145203-1dbf1c70-5ce9-4654-9995-4b794a8ee96e@linutronix.de \
    --to=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox