From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, soc@lists.linux.dev,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] docs: process: maintainer-soc-clean-dts: linux-next is decisive
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:48:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250225184822.213296-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225184822.213296-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Devicetree bindings patches go usually via driver subsystem tree, so
obviously testing only SoC branches would result in new dtbs_check
warnings. Mention that linux-next branch is decisice for zero-warnings
rule.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/process/maintainer-soc-clean-dts.rst | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc-clean-dts.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc-clean-dts.rst
index 1b32430d0cfc..5423fb7d6047 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc-clean-dts.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc-clean-dts.rst
@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ Strict DTS DT Schema and dtc Compliance
No changes to the SoC platform Devicetree sources (DTS files) should introduce
new ``make dtbs_check W=1`` warnings. Warnings in a new board DTS, which are
results of issues in an included DTSI file, are considered existing, not new
-warnings. The platform maintainers have automation in place which should point
-out any new warnings.
+warnings. For series split between different trees (DT bindings go via driver
+subsystem tree), warnings on linux-next are decisive. The platform maintainers
+have automation in place which should point out any new warnings.
If a commit introducing new warnings gets accepted somehow, the resulting
issues shall be fixed in reasonable time (e.g. within one release) or the
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 18:48 [PATCH 1/2] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Document sending DTS patches Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-25 18:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-02-26 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] docs: process: maintainer-soc-clean-dts: linux-next is decisive Rob Herring
2025-02-26 21:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-25 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs: dt: submitting-patches: Document sending DTS patches Laurent Pinchart
2025-02-26 15:44 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250225184822.213296-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox