From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E562121516C; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738685584; cv=none; b=hFMUiJvwQI3dcEIxhoUvPce6GKCLFTh2zeBD4RdKUxch1DWAKWx9+eJvmZUrVgLavyBhUvGgMZJAtSYHm0VXG+v13z19AoiFm0DNvl32ML9jZL99oHDDMTEP95QeiKySs9q3lPiVLQ1f2kZCxERFhNu6QUMyspLUp1e0yp2K86g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738685584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kDN+cZEWJ0y+gr5+wyDUwqCQ340N1h7v6kbhQyt2pZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qtEuvr1XfTARX/+SoDuAIsSrwPw9HU6OERlEk/WC1F1+RqfuILkKyLtMDKvfxS3dcSe80lY2Px6Pryd/iwS0gvOJfXOmrwbB9IerHzZYw/xPmO4//dCQyA9xBd8h0JBfTdZTTL6Dbr81EkV0EJLH98LW8mLTSGJMNHy61ZEOvJg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IszEr4KC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IszEr4KC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 000FBC4CEDF; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:13:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738685583; bh=kDN+cZEWJ0y+gr5+wyDUwqCQ340N1h7v6kbhQyt2pZI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IszEr4KCTJWzXEtgb2i4RvWZipq+KEhZCu05O7hR0hjdP47BdvX8Hx6dMByfBjDRo yjwKsm/OWjlKN9OWm+6iL/Ark+Z0v0y3GgLofosrm0WsbRL31Cp2Yqs6RuheFUNra5 KNJc5QFsYhVpYISc2o+p1xSEj1q97zemcGJaxe1fjbTARws3j/mM+/+35k8g/lWQHy GwprktS+jaGvOZzJQdV0Opih6QgL2nnE+nJoOS9cVW0Jop+zc6Tv40i3Nh3Y2cOuEL 7g48kWQNnZKrI8Mh19NE9VUumX6+dLw33sm8xjKdSVNOs5LTKbhGVy+9J4lvUDHD+O 1yxlnrnPXfePA== Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 08:13:01 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , corbet@lwn.net, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: submitting-patches: document the format for affiliation Message-ID: <20250204081301.6fdb1536@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250204154938.GF22963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20250203174626.1131225-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20250204071834.78e0ffb1@kernel.org> <20250204154938.GF22963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:49:38 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Or apparently project or customer names for consulting companies: >=20 > 29 Kory Maincent (Dent Project) > 34 Alexis Lothor=C3=A9 (eBPF Foundation) FWIW these are customer names, indeed. Project/Foundation pays for contracting work in both cases. > The other cases correctly refer to companeis, for contributors using > other email addresses: >=20 > 14 linux.dev > 41 zytor.com > 47 joelfernandes.org > 176 alien8.de > 243 gmail.com > 333 goodmis.org > 454 armlinux.org.uk > 918 infradead.org > 1007 kernel.org >=20 > Do we want to only document existing practices, or also tell which > one(s) should be favoured ? I'm hoping that documenting the most prevalent existing practice will naturally make it favored. IOW I'd prefer to document just=20 one option. I don't really care which one we pick, but the brackets seem most common.